Safety School Covers Myriad Topics for Ag Retailers

Safety School Covers Myriad Topics for Ag Retailers

Safety-School-Attendees

Attendees at the National Agronomic Environmental Health & Safety School learned why safety is increasingly important to the ag retail marketplace and how to make their operations more safe.

Advertisement

The National Agronomic Environmental Health And Safety School celebrated its 40th anniversary in style in August at The Asmark Institute Agricenter in Bloomington, IL. During the two-day event, attendees learned why safety is increasingly important to the ag retail marketplace and how to make their operations more safe.

Vroom

Jay Vroom, retiring CropLife America president, gave the keynote address at the Safety School.

The school started with a keynote address from Jay Vroom, the long-time President/CEO of CropLife America now heading into retirement. “I wish we had done better at safety for the last 30 years,” Vroom said. He then cited statistics from 2017 that showed there were 417 farmer/farm worker deaths during that year and are more than 100 ag workers who suffer some form of lost-time injury every day.

However, he believes the industry is headed in the right direction. “Being here in this Asmark facility dedicated to teaching about safety shows that our industry is finally putting an emphasis on safety for our business,” Vroom said.

Worker Protection Standard

Dustin Warder and Joe Becovitz discussed the Worker Protection Standard (WPS), which the U.S. EPA created in 1992 to protect employees on farms, forests, nurseries, and greenhouses that are occupationally exposed to agricultural pesticides. Revisions were made in 2015, with compliance required, for the most part, starting Jan. 2, 2017.

Delayed until Jan. 2 of this year were two additional WPS requirements: 1) New content on pesticide safety information must be displayed at a central location, and 2) Handlers must suspend applications if anyone is in the application exclusion zone (AEZ).

A new WPS requirement was announced June 22. By Dec. 19 (180 days) pesticide safety training for workers and handlers must be accomplished using materials that cover the expanded training content. The training must be done every year, and EPA must approve training materials and train-the-trainer (TTT) programs.

“Keep your records for that training for two years,” Warder, the Manager of Regulatory Affairs with the Asmark Institute, said. “If you are a certified applicator, you actually don’t have to have the WPS training, and you can be the one who is giving the training. I know during this first year there were locations that were having problems getting an approved trainer. One of the things longterm that will help with that is that they are planning to have a train-the-trainer course available online through the PERC (Pesticide Educational Resources Collaborative) website. A lot of people are planning on doing this over the winter before next spring.”

Warder added that EPA may reconsider several WPS requirements — minimum age, designated representative, and AEZ — before the New Year. “The bad part about that is that they were going to wait and announce that you start using your new training materials after they had made these changes. The way they’re doing it now, all the training materials you see out there, once they make these changes, they are going to have to be forwarded to you and reapproved and changed.”

Becovitz, a Pesticide Program Specialist with the Office of Indiana State Chemist, tackled WPS from the state perspective.

Regarding personal protective equipment (PPE), there is an exception for enclosed cabs that include working air filtration systems. “If they have that, they can pretty much lose the respirator and only wear a long-sleeve shirt, long pants, and shoes and socks while they’re making that application,” Becovitz said. “They still have to have the rest of that PPE with them in a sealed bag inside that cab or in an area where it’s not going to get pesticide on it.”

Becovitz stressed the importance of exchanging information between ag dealers and their customers. “This is one of those things that I know you’re supposed to be doing, but a lot of times I don’t think it does get done in either direction,” he said. “Your customer is supposed to be letting you know if anything has been applied to that field that they did or somebody else did that your employee, your applicator may be unknowingly exposed to if they had to get out of the cab for any reason. On the other side of that, you are also supposed to be letting the customer know ahead of time about what’s being applied.”

Ag dealers, Becovitz said, should provide customers with the: location of the application; product name, EPA registration number, and active ingredients; restricted entry interval (REI); posted warning, oral warning, or both; and start- and end-time dates of application. “The first four things you can give to your customer ahead of time in the form of a chart,” he added.

Ag dealers can plant field flags that include the date of application, but too often those flags are ignored by growers, Becovitz said. “We pretty much know they don’t (pay attention). Could you do it electronically (instead)? You could text that information to them. Whatever works, whatever is easiest for you, that’s fine,” he said.

The DOT is Watching

George Wyness, the Founder of Crossroads Safety Consulting, explained how to survive a U.S. Dept. of Transportation (DOT) compliance review or audit. He had worked 15 years as an enforcement officer with the Illinois Dept. of Transportation. “I used to be one of the bad guys. I quit DOT, and now I’m one of the good guys,” he joked.

For starters, Wyness recommended visiting the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) website, safer.fmcsa.dot.gov. “If you go through an audit, or if DOT is monitoring you, you can basically see the same information on this website that the government has on you,” he said.

Expect to be audited, Wyness said, if your rate of out-of-service driver violations is above the national average of 5%. “That’s what gets you on the radar screen with DOT,” he said.

On the other hand, a “satisfactory” safety rating tends to limit DOT audits. “If you get a ‘conditional’ (rating), it kind of hurts your insurance rates, a lot of customers may not use you, brokers won’t loan you; a conditional kind of plays havoc,” Wyness said. “With the third one, if you get a ‘unsatisfactory,’ that’s the worst of all — DOT just shuts you down.”

DOT monitors seven different areas of driving:

  • Accident record keeping
  • Financial responsibility (insurance)
  • Driver files
  • Drug/alcohol program
  • Hours of service
  • Vehicle maintenance and record keeping
  • Hazardous materials (if applicable)

“When you start getting pulled over and you have more violations, it cranks up what is called your CSA score,” Wyness said, referring to FMCSA’s Compliance, Safety, Accountability data-driven safety compliance and enforcement program. “When you get to a certain threshold, you get an alert. Generally, what triggers a DOT audit is if you have two alerts.

“The best way to avoid an audit is to have guys get pulled over with good roadside inspections — violation free. That will keep DOT the hell out of your business. … It’s a vicious circle. Once they got you, you’re screwed. They never get off you.”

Leave a Reply

Advertisement