Seed Treatment Stays Necessary

A few columns back, I detailed how agricultural market watchers were expecting grower-customers to cut back on certain items in 2015 to compensate for the drop in commodity prices cutting into their income. Since then, the market has seen some of this scaling back in action, with phosphate and potash fertilizer sales reportedly lagging and equipment purchases grinding to a halt.

But what about another previously “hot” area of the business – seed treatment? During the past couple of growing seasons, ag retailers have seen steady growth in their seed treatment businesses, and expanded their operations to fulfill these needs accordingly. Indeed, in our annual CropLife 100 survey of the nation’s top ag retailers, seed treatment revenue grew 1% to more than 10% for 76% of respondents.

Advertisement

Top Articles
Corn Growers 'Deeply Disappointed' in GREET Model Update

Do you think growers will cut back on seed treatments in 2015?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Still, the question remains: Will growers cut back on seed treatment as a way to save money in 2015? In a word, said one former BASF seed representative, no.

“Seed treatment is not considered a luxury,” said Mike McFatrich, the former director of seed solutions marketing for BASF at the American Seed Trade Association meeting in December. “And it’s more than just insurance. Growers are paying a lot of money for their seed, so they want to make certain it comes up. But they also are looking to optimize genetics and reduce potential plant stress to boost yields. That’s part of what seed treatment accomplishes.”

So as agricultural economics in 2015 potentially hurt other categories, ag retailers can be reasonably sure their seed treatment businesses should just keep growing.

0

Leave a Reply

Avatar for Larry Larry says:

All true. Too bad comments are not from someone who actually knows what they are talking about instead of a puppet. Farmers are not receiving that expected value due to poor application. Why does knowone know that or want to talk about it?

Avatar for Kyle Kyle says:

I am curious what you are referring to? “due to poor application” are you seeing poor application done commercially or are you referring to the “on the farm” treaters some companies have supplied to growers?

Avatar for Larry Larry says:

Actually both. Pedigreed seed tends to reduce some of the application variables of size, weight, shape, moisture, foreign material, but not 100%. Formulations vary in their colloidal nature, penetration, dispersion, retention abilities etc. Some are better than others. Some are terrible. (Any where from 5-50% individual seeds under minimum dose) Equipment has come along way but is not perfect yet. There are still some engineering flaws in volume delivery, initial contact, RPM, fullness, retention time, toroidal action, atomization, etc. Farmers need to be more aware. They may not be getting what they are expecting in value?

Advertisement
Advertisement