GMO Or DNA? LOL Or WTF?

When caught in rush hour traffic, I’ve always contended that at least 80% of the other drivers around me have no clue what they are doing. I’ve often wondered if this same level of ignorance could be applied to the certain topics when it comes to the general population as well.

Now, I have proof that this might indeed be the case.

Advertisement

For years now, I’ve been following the efforts by a select group of activists to sell to John Q. Public the need for food manufacturers to label their products if they contain materials sourced from genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) such as biotech corn or soybeans. In fact, according to research, just over 80% of Americans think this kind of labeling requirement on their foods is a good idea.

Top Articles
Ranch Systems Is a Recipient in the 2024 Digi Green Tech Awards

However, another recent survey found consumers might be confused when it comes to what kind of food labels they want. In research conducted by the Oklahoma State University Department of Agricultural Economics, more than 80% of respondents supported mandatory labeling for foods that contain deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). DNA is genetic material essential to all known forms of life (and present in all foods) while GMOs are edible organisms where some genetic material has been altered. The only thing these have in common is both are usually represented by their abbreviations when referred to in news stories.

What do you make of 80% of consumers opposing both DNA and GMO in foods?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Again, more than anything else, I think this speaks volumes to how effective biotech crop opponents have been in misinforming the American people regarding their causes. Now, whenever most consumers are asked about their views on food labeling requirements, any three-letter combination will likely raise suspicion, no matter what it really stands for.

Overall, I’m not really sure how to feel about all this. To put it into three-letter combinations, part of me wants to LOL. However, another part of me can’t help but think WTF.

Either way, I’m hopeful I haven’t just confused 80% of the folks reading this column!

0

Leave a Reply

Avatar for Julian Thomas Julian Thomas says:

The principle fallout from GMOs in inbred crops like wheat and barley will be locking in repeat seed sales through use agreements and laziness in rotating herbicides for weed control.

An ex wheat-breeder

Avatar for Dave Light Dave Light says:

While I agree that there is some confusion between GMO and DNA content of foods, as you point out the difference, your survey could also contain a button for “They are opposed to GMO with modified DNA; not opposed to natural DNA”. Labeling is a process that people who are opposed to GMO believe will give them a tool to avoid consuming GMO foods. The two biggest issues with GMO is simple: 1) lack of conclusive human test data on long-term effects of GMOs, and 2) the heavy-handed corporate lawyers from Monsanto (and others?) who have come down hard on farmers who don’t choose GMO seed and are then sued for having fields with “some” GMO seed detected. Iron-clad agreements are required from farmers. This sounds like a monopoly. Of course there is competition, but they have each other’s back it seems. If GMO is the best thing since sliced-bread, farmers and consumers would be clamoring for it like the next iPhone or Galaxy 6!

Why have the EU, China, and Russia for example, banned GMO? The jury is still out on GMO. Yes, the functional benefit “theory” sounds good, but are these benefits sustainable and safe? Yes, I know we really can’t avoid consuming some GMO, especially corn, soybeans and wheat. I am still alive after years of eating this stuff, but I have a number of ailments. All that people like me want is PROOF – clinical test data that GMO is as safe as any comparable non-GMO grain or plant. Why is that so hard to come up with Monsanto?

Some final questions to those of you who have been in farming for a number of years…. are your yields better with GMO? Are seed prices better? Is you herbicide and pesticide use higher or lower, and at what cost? Are your overall ag chemical costs lower with GMO? Is pest and weed control better, or more challenging and costly now? I use Google a lot, but I cannot find good quantitative and qualitative answers to the questions I have raised.

Thanks, Dave

Advertisement
Advertisement