Feeding The World: Nine Billion Shades Of Gray

For many years now, the agricultural world has had an almost laser-driven focus on the world’s projected population by the middle of the 21st century. Based upon virtually every researchers figures, the number of individuals that call our Earth home come 2050 should top the nine billion mark, up two billion from today’s count.

“The agricultural industry has made this information some kind of mantra,” says Allan Gray, director of the Center for Food and Agricultural Business at Purdue University. “And our industry has decided that we have to feed these nine billion people. But today, 893 million people on this planet already go to bed hungry each night!”

Speaking at a Dow AgroSciences media event in July, Gray also said that too much focus has been centered on where these extra two billion people will live. Based upon a series of population map projections from National Geographic magazine, Gray showed that countries such as China and India still lead the world in actual numbers. However, this won’t necessarily matter much down the road.

“Research shows that you need 2.1 children per family to grow your total population,” said Gray. “But China has been living with a one child policy for 40 years now, so the country’s population growth will slow very soon.”

And in pure numbers, Sub-Saharan Africa will be the fastest growing region on the planet by 2050, he added. “This is the youngest population in the world going forward,” said Gray.

Instead, Gray had a message to those in the media regarding getting too caught up in the nine billion population number. “Stop talking about nine billion people,” he told attendees. “Start talking about where they are.”

For those in the food industry, having extra spending money is the key to this population growth. “Sub-Saharan Africa may have the fastest growing population, but they’ve largely got no extra money,” said Gray. “The U.S. is still the richest country in the world. And the average person in China, because of its one child policy, has a lot of money to spend on food. Make no mistake — this is about business.”

For those in agriculture, this will open up all kinds of new opportunities for consumption going forward, said Gray. “Consumers with extra money to spend on food are demanding different kinds of products such as organically-produced milk and vegetables,” he said. “And agriculture cares about this kind of buying power and the industry is motivated to deliver to this group because they’ve proven they will pay more for these items.”

In the future, Gray predicted the debate about agriculture would focus on the word “and” vs. “or.” “We will need biotech crops because we have to feed the world and we need organic products for those who can pay of it.

“The world’s distribution of income is shifting,” he concluded. “Agriculture will be happy to feed everyone, if they have the income to pay for it.”

0

Leave a Reply

Avatar for Joseph Heckman Joseph Heckman says:

Organic farming is as much focused on quality of nourishment as food quantity. Organic agriculture pioneer Albert Howard described the problem with industrial agriculture as a “famine of quality”.

Avatar for Ed Ed says:

Perceived quality and actual quality are two different things. Organic production is perceived to be better quality because of the term “organic”. There are a lot of terms thrown around but in reality I have not heard or seen where organic is better than industrial, other than it is a nicer sounding word. Many are feeding their mind and not their bodies to comfort themselves that they are doing the “right” thing. But one inescapable fact remains. All will die whether they ate organic or not!

Avatar for jeffstohr jeffstohr says:

exactly Ed!

Avatar for jeffstohr jeffstohr says:

silly and not based on any facts or science

Avatar for tmgieseke tmgieseke says:

Thanks for the perspective. It has seemed that the ag community is missing the critical point as they rally around the 9B number.

Avatar for Andy Andy says:

Some demographers now believe population will top out at 8.3-8.5 billion around 2035. Global fertility rate is barely above maintenance level (2.5 vs. 2.3). Longer lifespan is currently a huge driver of population growth. When that ends, we enter long-term depopulation of the earth.

Advertisement
Advertisement