From the Ground Up: Why Soil Health — and the Innovations That Support It — Matter More Than Ever
February 27, 2026 After more than two decades working in agronomy — and a lifetime spent in the literal field — I’ve come to believe that nearly every challenge we face in farming circles back to a single starting point: the soil. Healthy soil is resilient soil, and resilient soil produces resilient crops. But soil health isn’t just a philosophy, nor is it just a buzz-word; it’s a practical, measurable difference-maker, even when we still struggle to quantify all its factors.
When I talk with growers about soil health, I often compare it to human or animal health. We accept without hesitation that a strong immune system helps a person or calf fight off challenges. We understand that good nutrition and a balanced gut biome are important long before trouble shows up. Soil is no different: a biologically active, well-structured, nutrient-efficient soil is better equipped to handle stress—and stress is something agriculture has no shortage of these days.
How to Spot Healthy Soil
Farmers often ask me, “What should I look for to know whether my soil is healthy?” And while soil tests, aggregate-stability scores, and microbial assays are improving, some of the best indicators still come from the field itself. One timeless example is earthworms. Decades of research — including studies from USDA-NRCS — show that earthworm presence correlates strongly with organic matter, water infiltration, aeration, and biological activity. The more worms in the soil, the healthier it is.
Residue breakdown is another sign. In long-term no-till systems, stalks decompose faster due to higher fungal activity and improved soil structure. Microbial enzyme activity increases significantly under long-term no-till and cover crops, accelerating residue breakdown and nutrient cycling.
And then there’s water — maybe the most visible indicator in my part of the country. During heavy rains, a healthy soil with strong structure absorbs more water and releases less sediment. This is backed by research, but it’s also something you can notice from the road. I saw it firsthand last June: one farm with long-term soil health practices had nearly clear runoff after a downpour, while a neighboring field — similar soils, similar crop — shed muddy water. Neither farmer was doing anything wrong. One soil just had the structure and biology to handle extremes.
This resilience matters even more during drought stress. Studies show that increasing soil organic matter improves a soil’s water-holding capacity significantly. According to USDA-NRCS, each 1% increase in organic matter allows the soil to hold an additional 20,000–25,000 gallons of water per acre — but you don’t need a lab report to recognize the difference between curled, stressed corn and corn that’s hanging on after three rainless weeks. Biology makes that possible.
Laying the Groundwork with Biologicals and NUE Technologies
This is where innovation bridges the gap between stewardship and profitability. When we first started working with stabilizers like Verdesian Life Science’s NutriSphere-N® or AVAIL® 15 years ago, soil health wasn’t part of the conversation. We were simply trying to keep nutrients available and reduce losses. But over time, it became clear that these tools support the soil’s biological engine — reducing salt stress, preventing tie-up, and promoting more consistent nutrient availability.
These improvements allow soil biology to do what it was designed to do. Research from Iowa State University and University of Illinois shows measurable increases in Nutrient Use Efficiency (“NUE”) when stabilizers are paired with soil-building practices — because microbes and root systems have a more predictable nutrient environment. These findings mirror what we’ve seen on our farms.
Years ago, breaking below 1 pound of nitrogen per bushel felt like a win. Today, we’re disappointed if we’re not around 0.8—and on farms with excellent soil health, we often do even better. That’s not cutting corners; that’s a system working as designed.
Phosphorus technology has delivered similar gains. When we first trialed Phree-uP® — before it even had a name — growers could identify the treated plants by sight alone. That rarely happens in agronomy. And the yield results confirmed what we saw in the field. Helping phosphorus stay available while unlocking tied-up reserves is a major win in areas like ours with heavy manure history.
Why Research and Replicated Trials Matter
Farming is a business; one where profitability matters year to year, not decade to decade. That’s why balancing soil health practices with immediate economic needs is one of our biggest challenges. Some people assume farmers don’t care about soil health, especially on rented ground. In my experience, that’s not the case. Growers care deeply; they just need an ROI that makes sense for the land they control.
Agriculture is full of products with big promises. That’s why we trial everything — on our 60-acre research farm, in replicated plots, and on growers’ real-world acres. We run side-by-side comparisons with competitive products because stewardship isn’t served by blind loyalty. It’s served by proof.
Biologicals, humics, folic acids, and nutrients-efficiency tools are often ways to invest in soil health on acres where long-term payback is harder to guarantee. Universities and USDA scientists have been clear on this point: biological products vary widely, and meaningful results depend on context, management systems, and soil conditions. That’s why we evaluate technologies under drought, excess moisture, manured soils, different tillage systems, and variable nutrient programs. Real soils make or break a product — not brochures.
Why Soil Health Matters: My Message to Farmers
When I talk to growers — or even neighbors who are skeptical of agriculture — I remind them of this simple truth: every farmer I’ve ever met wants to leave their land better than they found it. Soil health is one of the most meaningful ways to do that.
We can’t control the weather, commodity prices, or every regulation. But we can control how our soils function. If fertilizers invented in the 1940s and ’50s sparked a revolution in crop production, why wouldn’t the next revolution come from how we manage those nutrients? Why wouldn’t we embrace tools — biologicals, stabilizers, NUE technologies — that help soil biology do what it’s meant to do?
And if each of us can make even one improvement to the soil this season, why not do it? Why not be the difference?
Subscribe Today For
