The Effectiveness Of Nutrient Management Plans

UPDATED: January 28, 2013

Nutrient management plans (NMPs) are implemented to supply plants with ideal amounts of nutrients, minimize runoff pollutants, and maintain or improve the soil condition. As we continue to understand the effects farming practices have on the environment, NMPs present farmers with a set of conservation practices designed to reduce harmful pollutants while obtaining optimal crop yields.

Many U.S. Animal Feeding Operations (AFOs) produce excess N and P compared with the nutrient requirements of their cropland, and more regulations are being implemented to help reduce the pollution. In 1998, in response to President Clinton’s Clean Water Action Plan, the USDA and USEPA developed a Unified National Strategy to minimize the effects of AFOs on water quality and public health.

Today, each state has a different set of guidelines for NMPs, most of which involve farmers developing field-by-field records of nutrient applications. Currently, only Delaware and Maryland have nutrient management laws requiring all farmers to implement NMPs.

A study published in the March–April 2012 Agronomy Journal evaluates how effectively four dairy farms implemented their own NMPs from 1999 to 2005. The researchers, from the University of Connecticut and the USDA, compared the farmers’ reported practices with the recommended manure and fertilizer management plans and evaluated whether manure and fertilizer management had significant effects on the nutrient status of soil and corn tissue tests.

The majority of the cropland of the four farms selected for this study was used for corn silage, with substantial acreage also used for grass hay. The farmers’ priority for management and nutrient tests was corn, so only corn fields were used in this study. Each of the soils at the four farms had sandy loam to loam texture, a slope of 0% to 8%, organic matter content of 3 to 6%, and were moderately well to well-drained.

The NMPs of each farm consisted of two parts: a baseline year and the implementation years. In the baseline year, the research team collected information about each farm’s nutrient management. The factors considered included the number of livestock, cropland acreage, nutrient status of the cropland, manure production, manure management, and fertilizer management.

The farmers kept field-by-field records about manure and fertilizer applications but made no changes to the management of their nutrients. The information collected in the baseline year was used to develop field-by-field recommendations for manure and fertilizer management to be applied in the subsequent implementation years. The recommendations were based primarily on soil tests.

The rate of manure recommended was based on the amount of P needed by the crop, which researchers estimated from soil test results. If the farm had excess manure after fulfilling the crop’s P needs, recommendations were made to apply manure at a rate equal to the amount of P expected to be removed by the crop. If the farm still had manure leftover, it was to be applied to fields to meet the N requirement for the crop to fields that had a low potential to export P to water bodies. Chemical fertilizer recommendations were made after all manure was allocated.

Soil samples were routinely collected by farmers or crop advisers and analyzed at the University of Connecticut Soil Testing Laboratory. Samples were taken from the surface 30-cm layer from most of the fields in late spring when the corn was 15 to 30 cm tall. The samples underwent pre-sidedress nitrogen tests (PSNTs), which indicate how much nitrogen is available in the soil.

Cornstalk samples were also collected for corn stalk nitrate tests (CSNTs), which provide a retrospective assessment of a season’s nitrogen management. Farmers collected 15 cornstalk samples from each field during the period ranging from one week prior to harvest through one day after harvest.

During the implementation years, farmers were provided the results of the PSNT test and the recommended N sidedress. However, the percentage of times the farmers that actually applied the recommended N rate when the sidedress N recommendation was greater than zero was low, ranging from 6% to 24%.

The percentage of times the farmers applied the recommended N rate ranged from 79% to 90% when the recommended rate was zero. This data implies that farmers were not likely to follow recommendations derived from PSNT tests when the recommendation was to apply N. This behavior is supported by scientific reports showing that PSNT tests are most reliable when the N recommendation is zero.

The farmers applied fertilizer P at the recommended rate in the NMPs in the majority of the fields. In most years, more than 50% of the fields received a recommendation of zero fertilizer P, and farmers tended to follow that recommendation. Across the four farms, the overapplication of P occurred in less than 3% of the field-by-year combinations. This data shows that farmers were willing to adopt P fertilizer recommendations provided in their NMPs.

Only a small percentage of the fields, ranging from 3% to 37%, received the recommended amount of manure N and P. Variability in the amount of residual N available from previous manure applications caused great variance in the PSNT and CSNT tests, indicating that several years of data are needed before these tests can be used to accurately evaluate the performance of a NMP.

The four farmers in this study seemed confident that fertilizer recommendations were appropriate when based on soil tests, especially recommendations for fertilizer P. However, there was no significant change in soil test P values, probably due to the large spatial variation of P in the fields.

The results from this study showed no decreasing trend in the concentrations of nitrate in the PSNT and CSNT tests. The large variation in the amounts of manure and fertilizer applied by the farmers may be responsible for this lack of improvement.

Only a small percentage of fields received the recommended amount of manure application, and no significant decrease in the amount of manure over application compared with the recommended amount was found in this study.

Documenting improvements in N and P management after the implementation of an NMP proved to be a difficult task for the researchers of this study, due to both biological and management factors, such as non-uniform manure spreading and annual variations in weather, especially rainfall.  

Overall, the researchers say that manure and fertilizer management on dairy farms could be improved by using a longer timeframe than the three- to five-year plans typically used by NMPs. Management plans implemented using a process of adaptive management for N, which provides more detailed, continuous evaluations about the N status of corn fields, have also been shown to improve N management.

Leave a Reply

Crop Inputs Stories
Crop InputsPlatform Specialty Products To Acquire Arysta LifeScience
October 20, 2014
Once the acquisition is complete, Platform Specialty Products will combine Arysta LifeScience with previously acquired companies Agriphar and Chemtura Crop Solutions. Read More
MicronutrientsMicronutrients Going Macro
September 9, 2014
Between 2014’s fantastic growing conditions and a heightened awareness on plant nutrition, the major players in micronutrients are gearing up for another big year. Read More
FertilizerFall Fertility 2014: Forecasting Fertilizer Use
September 7, 2014
Great crops this year have tapped the soil, and fall work is definitely called for, but how challenging will that get? Read More
FungicidesSudden Death Syndrome, Brown Stem Rot Reported In Indiana Soybeans
September 3, 2014
Farmers and retailers should be watching for symptoms of these two diseases over the next few weeks as they are best managed through preventative methods. Read More
Top 100 Articles
Milan Kucerak, president/CEO, West Central
CropLife 100West Central Cooperative And Its New President Are A Match Made In Deviation
June 29, 2015
To appreciate just how unique West Central Cooperative is in the world of ag retail, an observer need only consider Read More
Winter Wheat
CropLife 100South Dakota Co-op Member Owners Vote No On Unification
June 26, 2015
The Boards of Directors for North Central Farmers Elevator (NCFE) and Wheat Growers (WG) have announced that member-owners have voted Read More
CropLife 100The Andersons Acquires South Dakota Plant Nutrient Manufacturer Kay-Flo
May 20, 2015
The Andersons, Inc., ranked No. 22 on the CropLife 100, has purchased Kay Flo Industries of North Sioux City, SD. “This Read More
CropLife 100AgGateway’s Barcoding Initiative Progressing Nicely
May 8, 2015
According to legend (or Wikipedia), the first step towards modern bar codes came back in 1948, when Bernard Silver, a Read More
CropLife 100Pinnacle Agriculture Acquires Minnesota Retailer
April 14, 2015
Pinnacle Agriculture Holdings, LLC, ranked No. 6 on the CropLife 100,  has successfully acquired Liebl Ag, LLC in Ada, MN.  Read More
CropLife 100CHS, Aurora Cooperative Complete Fertilizer Storage, Grain Shuttle Loading Facility
April 13, 2015
CHS Inc., the nation’s leading cooperative and ranked No. 5 on the CropLife 100, and Aurora Cooperative (ranked No. 21) Read More
Latest News
Agworld Apple Watch Farm Management
EquipmentAussie Data Management Software Company Making Its Mark…
July 4, 2015
Zach Sheely, vice president of sales and operations, says that several large, well-known U.S. cooperatives (Stanislaus Farm Supply, Wilco-Winfield and Read More
Topcon AGI-4 on MF Planter
EquipmentAutosteer: Compatibility, Accuracy Remain Top Of Mind
July 3, 2015
The world of automatic steering solutions in agriculture has evolved rapidly in the last few years. From after-market add-ons that Read More
ManagementUnited Suppliers/Land ‘O Lakes Merger & Crop Update
July 2, 2015
CropLife’s Paul Schrimpf and Eric Sfiligoj talk about the reasons behind the United Suppliers/Land ‘O Lakes merger and USDA’s recent Read More
Industry NewsBioSafe Adds To Sales Force
July 2, 2015
BioSafe Systems has announced the hire of two new members for its service team. David Britt recently joined the team Read More
Chesapeake Bay
ManagementChesapeake Bay Clean-Up Gets Renewed Attention
July 2, 2015
The Chesapeake Bay has been called one of the most biologically productive ecosystems in the world. It’s also one of Read More
Measuring Bulk Tanks
ManagementBulk Pesticide Compliance: Top 10 Areas Of Improvement …
July 1, 2015
  In honor of the 33-year run of David Letterman’s Late Show, the American Agronomic Stewardship Alliance (AASA) is happy Read More
Industry NewsArysta North America Hires Midwest Sales Manager
July 1, 2015
Arysta LifeScience North America recently announced the hiring of Brian Battles as the Senior Technical Sales Manager for the Midwest Read More
Farmer on tablet
Eric SfiligojThe Never-Ending Battle Against Modern Agriculture
July 1, 2015
In the world of comic books, the character of Superman often refers to the fight to save the world as Read More
Retail FacilitiesBuilding Up Ag Retail
July 1, 2015
In the oftentimes unpredictable world we live in, it’s nice to know some things can be reliably countered on to Read More
Retail FacilitiesMaple River Grain And Agronomy Phases In Site Developme…
July 1, 2015
Marcus Construction helped Maple River Grain and Agronomy in Casselton, ND, with the design-build of its dry fertilizer, liquid chemical/seed Read More
Retail FacilitiesA&B Welding Builds A New Liquid Terminal Hub For Br…
July 1, 2015
To build its new hub facility, Briggs Crop Nutrients enlisted the help of A&B Welding. The result, an efficient facility Read More
Edon Farmers Co-op
Retail FacilitiesNew Marcus Facility At Edon Farmers Co-op Provides More…
July 1, 2015
Edon Farmers Co-Op in Edon, OH, needed a new facility to consolidate outdated locations. Marcus Construction was able to design Read More
Retail FacilitiesKinder Morgan Expands Its Storage With A New Dome Barre…
July 1, 2015
Kinder Morgan wanted additional covered storage at its Dakota Bulk Terminal on the Mississippi River in St. Paul, MN. With Read More
Retail FacilitiesHeartland Tank Protects Fertilizer From Extreme Cold At…
July 1, 2015
The Arthur Companies in Harvey, ND, enlisted the help of Heartland Tank Companies to develop a new liquid fertilizer facility Read More
The McGregor Co. fertilizer loadout
Retail FacilitiesThe McGregor Co. Partners With Kahler Automation To Cre…
June 30, 2015
Kahler Automation helped The McGregor Co. expand its Clarkston, WA, operation with unstaffed loadout technology that enables customers to pick Read More
Dry and Liquid Plant
Retail FacilitiesKahler Automation Helps CHS Dakota Ag Cooperative Build…
June 30, 2015
CHS Dakota Ag Cooperative in Mooreton, ND, wanted a liquid/dry blender system that could meet the needs of its customers Read More
Crop InputsLand O’Lakes, United Suppliers To Merge Crop Inpu…
June 29, 2015
Land O’Lakes, Inc. and United Suppliers, Inc. of Ames, IA, today announced their intent to merge their crop inputs businesses. Read More
FungicidesHelena To Distribute Unique Summit Agro Fungicide
June 29, 2015
RANMAN 400 SC fungicide, the only fungicide with a FRAC group 21 designation, is now part of the innovative Summit Read More