Crop Protection Ruling Source Of Concern
April 7, 2009 The Weed Science Society of America (WSSA) and other ag groups are asking EPA to request a rehearing of the recent Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decision defining pesticides as pollutants and requiring Clean Water Act permits before they can be applied in or near water sources. The Court’s ruling overrides existing government regulations for pesticides that are based on extensive scientific analysis.
Currently the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) requires all pesticides marketed in the U.S. to be assessed for potential risks to both people and the environment. These scientific risk analyses determine which products are registered for use and how registered products are to be applied. No one may sell, distribute, or use a pesticide unless it is registered by EPA under FIFRA. The Clean Water Act permitting process mandated by the Court of Appeals, however, would in effect supersede FIFRA analyses.
More than 60 years after FIFRA was enacted, it remains a significant government success story — resulting in new weed control strategies and safer products that are far more precise and benign to the environment than ever before. Crop yields have soared, tillage and erosion have plummeted, and millions of acres of natural habitats have been protected for future generations.
“As a nonprofit professional society devoted to the scientific study of weeds, we fully support government regulation of pesticide use,” says Lee Van Wychen, WSSA science policy director. “But the new permitting system mandated by the Sixth District Court of Appeals overrides FIFRA without offering any additional protection. It places an unnecessary, unfunded burden on states, growers, and applicators, and will discourage the timely and effective management of invasive plants and weeds. We strongly urge the EPA to file a petition for rehearing before the Court’s April 9 deadline.”
(Source: Weed Science Society Of America)
Subscribe Today For
