Building A Net Promoter Road Map

Last month, I provided a high-level view of getting sales staff aligned with customers in your company or organization using a customer loyalty metric like the Customer Experience Monitor. We discussed why change is hard and the importance of getting front-line staff aligned and involved with improving customer loyalty.

This month, we will begin building a company road map to use customer experiences to guide improvements. A successful journey to increase customer loyalty involves a combination of committed staff, clear process, and data technologies. There is always low hanging (but previously unseen) fruit that can be harvested quickly. I call these Operational wins. Operational improvements generally involve one customer at a time. They are tactical opportunities to improve customer experiences at the point of contact.

Imagine this spring that one of your customers will experience a delay in a field being sprayed. This, in turn, impacts his seeding schedule and he is upset with your company. He calls his sales agronomist, who responds immediately, apologizes for the delay, and then reschedules the application with another rig within the next few hours. The service recovery effort exceeds the customer’s expectations and a possible Detractor is converted to a Promoter. Aren’t you glad the call didn’t get stacked up in voice mail?

Discussing Structure

Other company changes that impact loyalty are more Structural in nature. Implementing them takes longer but they often have a deeper impact on loyalty and revenue than Operational changes. Structural changes typically involve the business model, product design, or service delivery processes.

Let’s move on to survey considerations and see how design decisions there relate to the Operational/Struc­tural issue. As you start to measure your Net Promoter Score, your first decision is whether to implement a Transactional of Relationship survey. Transactional surveys measure specific events involving a customer. The quality of a sales call, clarity of an invoice, or accuracy of field spraying are events where the customer experience can be measured. The timing of the feedback is dictated by the timing of the event. Measurement of these moments of truth often reveal opportunities where service delivery can be improved.

But what if you want to measure the overall health of your relationship with your most profitable customers? We definitely want these relationships to continue! In this case, a customer’s willingness to recommend you likely results from many interactions over one or more sales cycles. In this case, a relationship measurement is needed to gauge the customer’s accumulated experience. Relationship Net Promoter Scores (NPS) capture the overall perception that customers and prospects have of your company and are not based on any one interaction. Typically, relationship NPS are gathered on a periodic basis that reflects a company’s business cycle.

For ag retailers, I recommend a relationship measurement be taken twice a year, potentially in the winter and in the summer before harvest. A consistent data collection strategy helps to build comparable data from one period to another. This, in turn, increases the validity of any decision you make from your customer experience data.

  Operational Improvements Structural Improvements
Relationship Relationship management. Strength and weaknesses of competitors.

Relationship
Feedback

Pipeline analysis. Company messages.
 
 
Account management and performance. Segmentation.
  Support of mergers and acquisitions.
Transactional Key customer recovery. Sales quality improvements.
Feedback Manage prospect concerns. Process improvements.
  Sales agronomist coaching. Equipment investments.
Performance management.  

Looking At Transactionals

If the transactional measurements you make are on significant events that drive the strength of your relationship, they will be leading indicators of relationship NPS. In other words, as your NPS increases or falls based on key customer interactions, this will predict the future health of your overall relationship with a customer.

Here’s one final consideration in thinking about transactional vs. relationship measurements: The most effective benchmarking efforts are made across the entire relationship. A specific transactional-type benchmark at a single touchpoint may not reveal whether your organization has successfully differentiated itself. For this reason, AgKnowlogy uses a relationship feedback to benchmark its clients against their competition from a complete end-to-end perspective.

As we conclude this month’s column, you might be thinking that transactional measurements only drive operational improvements, and relationship measurements are used only for structural changes. The reality is that both operational and structural measurements can be used both tactically and strategically. This is shown in the example above.

As we have been discussing in these columns, the quality of a customer’s experiences or a prospect’s perceptions with your company have strong impacts on loyalty (in the case of customers) and the likeliness of trying your service, in the case of prospects. AgKnowlogy’s Customer Experience Monitor measures customer and prospect experience and perceptions to help ag retailers make key operational and structural improvements. Transactional measurements tend to measure the quality of specific events in the customer sales cycle. These measurements help you make operational improvements in how you service customers. Relationship measurements, on the other hand, are meant to measure the overall strength of the customer equity you have built up over time. These measurements can help you make significant structural improvements to your company.

Next month, we’ll discuss the customer corridor, and I will show you how transactional and relationship measurements can be taken along the corridor.

Leave a Reply

Latest News
FertilizerGypsum Added To List Of Conservation Practices
July 28, 2016
Crop farmers in a growing number of states may be eligible for financial assistance from the USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Read More
Management2016 CTIC Cover Crop Survey: 33% Report ROI From Cover …
July 28, 2016
Insight from 2,020 farmers from across the country reflected enthusiasm for cover crops and—for the fourth year in a row—found Read More
Palmer pigweed seedhead in cotton
HerbicidesStudy: Fall Weed Controls Can Make Significant Impact O…
July 28, 2016
An article published in the latest issue of the journal Weed Science shows that adopting harvest-time and post-harvest weed controls Read More
InsecticidesSyngenta: Beware Of Early Stinkbug Threat To Soybeans
July 28, 2016
With the record warm temperatures this past winter and confirmations from early entomologist reports, Syngenta encourages growers to monitor stinkbug Read More
Peanut field
Crop InputsVerdesian Introduces New Inoculant For Peanuts
July 28, 2016
As planning begins for the next growing season, Verdesian Life Sciences adds Primo Power CL, a new liquid inoculant, to Read More
Soil Young Corn
Crop InputsSmithsonian: 5 Things to Know About New GMO Labeling Bi…
July 27, 2016
On July 14, the House of Representatives passed a bill requiring large food companies to label products containing genetically modified Read More
Palmer pigweed in soybean stubble
HerbicidesSpecial Issue Of Weed Science Explores Human Aspects Of…
July 27, 2016
Weeds that evolve resistance to herbicides are a serious threat to global agricultural production. In this Special Issue of Weed Science, Read More
CHS Primeland
CropLife 100CHS Businesses In Washington, Idaho Combining For Great…
July 27, 2016
As full-service ag retailers, CHS Primeland and CHS Farmers Co-op collectively serve farmers and other customers in 15 counties in Read More
Storage Tanks at Nachurs
Crop InputsNACHURS Joins Field to Market
July 27, 2016
NACHURS announced today that it has joined Field to Market: The Alliance for Sustainable Agriculture, a leading multi-stakeholder initiative working Read More
Illinois Researchers
FertilizerMeasure Of Age In Soil Nitrogen Could Help Precision Ag…
July 26, 2016
What’s good for crops is not always good for the environment. Nitrogen, a key nutrient for plants, can cause problems Read More
Kochia
Crop InputsNufarm Launches New Herbicide for Resistant Kochia
July 25, 2016
Nufarm introduces Scorch herbicide for U.S. farmers and ranchers combating a broad range of troublesome broadleaf weeds. A unique premix Read More
ManagementNew Rabobank Report Calls for Farmer ROI Focus
July 25, 2016
As U.S. row crop farmers brace themselves for a third year of negative margins, Rabobank believes farmers must lower the Read More
Syngenta Sign
Crop InputsBloomberg: Syngenta-Chem China Deal on Track for Regula…
July 25, 2016
Syngenta AG, which has agreed to be taken over by China National Chemical Corp. for $43 billion, said talks with Read More
ManagementGROWMARK Meeting Visit, Company Takeover Updates, and R…
July 22, 2016
Editors Paul Schrimpf and Eric Sfiligoj discuss their recent speaking engagement at GROWMARK’s eastern event, crop protection company merger rumors, Read More
Crop InputsMonsanto: EU Approves Roundup Ready 2 Xtend Imports
July 22, 2016
Monsanto Co. announced today that the European Commission has granted import approval for Roundup Ready 2 Xtend soybeans. This milestone Read More
Syngenta headquarters in Basel, Switzerland
Crop InputsSyngenta Announces Alfalfa Seed Split Off
July 22, 2016
On September 1, 2016, Syngenta will transfer sales and distribution of alfalfa seed to the NEXGROW branded business that is Read More
Dow DuPont
Crop InputsDuPont, Dow Shareholders Approve Merger
July 21, 2016
DuPont and The Dow Chemical Company announced that, at their respective special meetings of stockholders held today, stockholders of both Read More
ManagementLand O’Lakes Announces SUSTAIN Business Unit, Oth…
July 20, 2016
Land O’Lakes, Inc. today announced the formal organization of a new business unit, SUSTAIN, and its leadership. SUSTAIN will focus Read More