Building A Net Promoter Road Map

Last month, I provided a high-level view of getting sales staff aligned with customers in your company or organization using a customer loyalty metric like the Customer Experience Monitor. We discussed why change is hard and the importance of getting front-line staff aligned and involved with improving customer loyalty.

This month, we will begin building a company road map to use customer experiences to guide improvements. A successful journey to increase customer loyalty involves a combination of committed staff, clear process, and data technologies. There is always low hanging (but previously unseen) fruit that can be harvested quickly. I call these Operational wins. Operational improvements generally involve one customer at a time. They are tactical opportunities to improve customer experiences at the point of contact.

Imagine this spring that one of your customers will experience a delay in a field being sprayed. This, in turn, impacts his seeding schedule and he is upset with your company. He calls his sales agronomist, who responds immediately, apologizes for the delay, and then reschedules the application with another rig within the next few hours. The service recovery effort exceeds the customer’s expectations and a possible Detractor is converted to a Promoter. Aren’t you glad the call didn’t get stacked up in voice mail?

Discussing Structure

Other company changes that impact loyalty are more Structural in nature. Implementing them takes longer but they often have a deeper impact on loyalty and revenue than Operational changes. Structural changes typically involve the business model, product design, or service delivery processes.

Let’s move on to survey considerations and see how design decisions there relate to the Operational/Struc­tural issue. As you start to measure your Net Promoter Score, your first decision is whether to implement a Transactional of Relationship survey. Transactional surveys measure specific events involving a customer. The quality of a sales call, clarity of an invoice, or accuracy of field spraying are events where the customer experience can be measured. The timing of the feedback is dictated by the timing of the event. Measurement of these moments of truth often reveal opportunities where service delivery can be improved.

But what if you want to measure the overall health of your relationship with your most profitable customers? We definitely want these relationships to continue! In this case, a customer’s willingness to recommend you likely results from many interactions over one or more sales cycles. In this case, a relationship measurement is needed to gauge the customer’s accumulated experience. Relationship Net Promoter Scores (NPS) capture the overall perception that customers and prospects have of your company and are not based on any one interaction. Typically, relationship NPS are gathered on a periodic basis that reflects a company’s business cycle.

For ag retailers, I recommend a relationship measurement be taken twice a year, potentially in the winter and in the summer before harvest. A consistent data collection strategy helps to build comparable data from one period to another. This, in turn, increases the validity of any decision you make from your customer experience data.

  Operational Improvements Structural Improvements
Relationship Relationship management. Strength and weaknesses of competitors.

Relationship
Feedback

Pipeline analysis. Company messages.
 
 
Account management and performance. Segmentation.
  Support of mergers and acquisitions.
Transactional Key customer recovery. Sales quality improvements.
Feedback Manage prospect concerns. Process improvements.
  Sales agronomist coaching. Equipment investments.
Performance management.  

Looking At Transactionals

If the transactional measurements you make are on significant events that drive the strength of your relationship, they will be leading indicators of relationship NPS. In other words, as your NPS increases or falls based on key customer interactions, this will predict the future health of your overall relationship with a customer.

Here’s one final consideration in thinking about transactional vs. relationship measurements: The most effective benchmarking efforts are made across the entire relationship. A specific transactional-type benchmark at a single touchpoint may not reveal whether your organization has successfully differentiated itself. For this reason, AgKnowlogy uses a relationship feedback to benchmark its clients against their competition from a complete end-to-end perspective.

As we conclude this month’s column, you might be thinking that transactional measurements only drive operational improvements, and relationship measurements are used only for structural changes. The reality is that both operational and structural measurements can be used both tactically and strategically. This is shown in the example above.

As we have been discussing in these columns, the quality of a customer’s experiences or a prospect’s perceptions with your company have strong impacts on loyalty (in the case of customers) and the likeliness of trying your service, in the case of prospects. AgKnowlogy’s Customer Experience Monitor measures customer and prospect experience and perceptions to help ag retailers make key operational and structural improvements. Transactional measurements tend to measure the quality of specific events in the customer sales cycle. These measurements help you make operational improvements in how you service customers. Relationship measurements, on the other hand, are meant to measure the overall strength of the customer equity you have built up over time. These measurements can help you make significant structural improvements to your company.

Next month, we’ll discuss the customer corridor, and I will show you how transactional and relationship measurements can be taken along the corridor.

Leave a Reply

Latest News
ManagementTrip Report, PSM R.I.P, and Ag’s Reaction to Federal Bu…
May 25, 2017
Editors Paul Schrimpf and Eric Sfiligoj talk about their recent travels, the end for Process Safety Management (PSM), and how Read More
Corn soil
LegislationARA Member Testifies Before Senate Ag Committee
May 25, 2017
Agricultural retailers stand on the front-lines of the American economy. As trusted advisors to America’s farmers, ag retailers are uniquely Read More
Young corn plants in soil
Crop InputsFortenza Insecticide Seed Treatment Receives EPA Regist…
May 25, 2017
Fortenza seed treatment insecticide from Syngenta has received registration approval from the U.S. EPA for use on corn and cotton Read More
ManagementFarm Market iD’s Agriculture Database Now Covers More T…
May 25, 2017
Farm Market iD, farmmarketid.com, has announced the release of its 2017 Annual Update of its farm and land database. The Read More
Food IT Fork-to-Farm
Precision AgThe Mixing Bowl Event Connects Technology, Food, and Ag…
May 24, 2017
For the fourth consecutive year, The Mixing Bowl presents FOOD IT, under the theme “Fork to Farm.” Action-oriented entrepreneurs, industry Read More
Photo credit: The United Soybean Board/The Soybean Checkoff.
Seed/BiotechKansas State University Researchers Find New Pathogens …
May 24, 2017
A single seed seems so simple. Put it in the ground, give it some care, and you’ve soon grown food. Read More
Soybean Field
HerbicidesNew Dicamba Herbicide Premix Coming Soon from Syngenta
May 24, 2017
Syngenta has announced the name of its new herbicide featuring the active ingredients of S-metolachlor and dicamba. Upon registration by Read More
Eric SfiligojMonsanto ‘Picks Its Battles’ by Nixing Deere Deal
May 23, 2017
Having been in the trade journalism game since the mid-1980s, I remember several watershed moments during my career. One of Read More
FungicidesSyngenta Launches New Seed Treatment Fungicide
May 22, 2017
Syngenta has announced the launch of PLENARIS seed treatment fungicide for the control of downy mildew in sunflower. PLENARIS contains Read More
Corn close up
Crop InputsMonsanto’s First HPPD Herbicide Garners EPA Appro…
May 19, 2017
Monsanto announced today that EPA has federally approved Harness MAX Herbicide, the first herbicide in the Monsanto portfolio to provide Read More
ManagementPrecision Planting Deal, China Developments, and Enviro…
May 18, 2017
Editors Eric Sfiligoj and Dan Jacobs discuss the latest news on John Deere’s now dead deal for Precision Planting, China’s Read More
Soybean aphid leaf
InsecticidesMulti-state Research Reveals IPM Best Option for Treatm…
May 17, 2017
About 89.5 million acres of soybeans will be planted across the U.S. in 2017 — a record high, according to Read More
GROWMARK-2017-Interns
CropLife 100GROWMARK Names 2017 Summer Interns
May 16, 2017
Forty-two college students are exploring agricultural career opportunities this summer as GROWMARK interns. They are working at FS member cooperatives Read More
Migrant farm workers
LegislationTrump: Immigration Crackdown Won’t Impact U.S. Ag…
May 16, 2017
President Donald Trump said he would seek to keep his tough immigration enforcement policies from harming the U.S. farm industry Read More
Flooded corn in Indiana
FertilizerBoth Wet and Dry Conditions Threaten Nitrogen Loss
May 15, 2017
The weather is notoriously unpredictable, leading to challenges for planting, harvesting and applying the nitrogen (N) your corn crop needs. Read More
farmer Kip Tom
Precision AgAg Tech: On the Cusp of Something Big?
May 15, 2017
The investment and ag-tech sectors’ continuing courtship of agriculture, smoldering for three or four years now, was well in evidence at Read More
AGCO Ratliff featured
Eric SfiligojRemembering Robert Ratliff
May 15, 2017
With all the fast-paced happenings in agriculture this spring, with multiple mergers in the works and planting season in full Read More
Greg Musson, Gar Tootelian
ManagementOpinion: Shaking Your Perspective in Ag Retail
May 12, 2017
Some of you I’m sure have encountered our recently retired salesman extraordinaire, Dan Bellanger. He worked in the industry for Read More