Building A Net Promoter Road Map

Last month, I provided a high-level view of getting sales staff aligned with customers in your company or organization using a customer loyalty metric like the Customer Experience Monitor. We discussed why change is hard and the importance of getting front-line staff aligned and involved with improving customer loyalty.

This month, we will begin building a company road map to use customer experiences to guide improvements. A successful journey to increase customer loyalty involves a combination of committed staff, clear process, and data technologies. There is always low hanging (but previously unseen) fruit that can be harvested quickly. I call these Operational wins. Operational improvements generally involve one customer at a time. They are tactical opportunities to improve customer experiences at the point of contact.

Imagine this spring that one of your customers will experience a delay in a field being sprayed. This, in turn, impacts his seeding schedule and he is upset with your company. He calls his sales agronomist, who responds immediately, apologizes for the delay, and then reschedules the application with another rig within the next few hours. The service recovery effort exceeds the customer’s expectations and a possible Detractor is converted to a Promoter. Aren’t you glad the call didn’t get stacked up in voice mail?

Discussing Structure

Other company changes that impact loyalty are more Structural in nature. Implementing them takes longer but they often have a deeper impact on loyalty and revenue than Operational changes. Structural changes typically involve the business model, product design, or service delivery processes.

Let’s move on to survey considerations and see how design decisions there relate to the Operational/Struc­tural issue. As you start to measure your Net Promoter Score, your first decision is whether to implement a Transactional of Relationship survey. Transactional surveys measure specific events involving a customer. The quality of a sales call, clarity of an invoice, or accuracy of field spraying are events where the customer experience can be measured. The timing of the feedback is dictated by the timing of the event. Measurement of these moments of truth often reveal opportunities where service delivery can be improved.

But what if you want to measure the overall health of your relationship with your most profitable customers? We definitely want these relationships to continue! In this case, a customer’s willingness to recommend you likely results from many interactions over one or more sales cycles. In this case, a relationship measurement is needed to gauge the customer’s accumulated experience. Relationship Net Promoter Scores (NPS) capture the overall perception that customers and prospects have of your company and are not based on any one interaction. Typically, relationship NPS are gathered on a periodic basis that reflects a company’s business cycle.

For ag retailers, I recommend a relationship measurement be taken twice a year, potentially in the winter and in the summer before harvest. A consistent data collection strategy helps to build comparable data from one period to another. This, in turn, increases the validity of any decision you make from your customer experience data.

  Operational Improvements Structural Improvements
Relationship Relationship management. Strength and weaknesses of competitors.

Relationship
Feedback

Pipeline analysis. Company messages.
 
 
Account management and performance. Segmentation.
  Support of mergers and acquisitions.
Transactional Key customer recovery. Sales quality improvements.
Feedback Manage prospect concerns. Process improvements.
  Sales agronomist coaching. Equipment investments.
Performance management.  

Looking At Transactionals

If the transactional measurements you make are on significant events that drive the strength of your relationship, they will be leading indicators of relationship NPS. In other words, as your NPS increases or falls based on key customer interactions, this will predict the future health of your overall relationship with a customer.

Here’s one final consideration in thinking about transactional vs. relationship measurements: The most effective benchmarking efforts are made across the entire relationship. A specific transactional-type benchmark at a single touchpoint may not reveal whether your organization has successfully differentiated itself. For this reason, AgKnowlogy uses a relationship feedback to benchmark its clients against their competition from a complete end-to-end perspective.

As we conclude this month’s column, you might be thinking that transactional measurements only drive operational improvements, and relationship measurements are used only for structural changes. The reality is that both operational and structural measurements can be used both tactically and strategically. This is shown in the example above.

As we have been discussing in these columns, the quality of a customer’s experiences or a prospect’s perceptions with your company have strong impacts on loyalty (in the case of customers) and the likeliness of trying your service, in the case of prospects. AgKnowlogy’s Customer Experience Monitor measures customer and prospect experience and perceptions to help ag retailers make key operational and structural improvements. Transactional measurements tend to measure the quality of specific events in the customer sales cycle. These measurements help you make operational improvements in how you service customers. Relationship measurements, on the other hand, are meant to measure the overall strength of the customer equity you have built up over time. These measurements can help you make significant structural improvements to your company.

Next month, we’ll discuss the customer corridor, and I will show you how transactional and relationship measurements can be taken along the corridor.

Leave a Reply

Latest News
Growmark FS Outlet
Industry NewsGROWMARK To Purchase Suncor’s Share Of UPI
September 26, 2016
GROWMARK and Suncor have reached an agreement in which GROWMARK will purchase Suncor’s 50% interest in UPI, Inc. in Ontario, Read More
Corn Field
Eric SfiligojFacing Ag Industry Challenges
September 26, 2016
At the 2016 annual Mid America CropLife Association (MACA) meeting in September, a pair of crop protection company representatives discussed Read More
Syngenta Seedcare Institute
Seed/BiotechSyngenta Opens New North America Seedcare Institute In …
September 23, 2016
Syngenta unveiled its new Seedcare Institute in Stanton, MN, during a recent grand opening celebration. More than 150 industry leaders, Read More
StewardshipMonsanto Invests $1.6 Million In System To Quantify Gre…
September 23, 2016
The USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) recently awarded the National Corn Growers Association (NCGA) and its Soil Health Read More
Pipe rack
LegislationCourt Sides With Ag Retailers On PSM
September 23, 2016
The D.C. Court of Appeals has ruled the Occupational Safety and Health Administration violated the Occupational Safety and Health Act when Read More
ManagementPacific Coast Fertilizer Announces Interest In Longview…
September 22, 2016
Pacific Coast Fertilizer LP (PCF) announced at the Cowlitz Economic Development Council board of directors meeting its interest in developing Read More
Young corn plants in soil
UncategorizedCool Planet Raises Additional $9 Million To Commerciali…
September 22, 2016
Cool Planet has announced the first close of a new financing round to commercialize the company’s Cool Terra Engineered Biocarbon Read More
Crop InputsJim Loar Promoted To President And CEO Of Cool Planet
September 22, 2016
In a move that reflects and reinforces the company’s commitment to the agricultural market, the Cool Planet board of directors Read More
BlendersNorth Dakota Coop Debuts Dry Fertilizer Plant
September 22, 2016
North Central Grain Cooperative has begun operations at a new dry fertilizer plant at its Rolla, ND, site. It is Read More
Crop InputsMonsanto, Bayer Officials Defend Proposed $66 Billion M…
September 21, 2016
Top officials for Monsanto and Bayer defended their proposed $66 billion merger before skeptical senators on Tuesday, insisting that the Read More
ManagementUpcoming Shows & Recent Events
September 19, 2016
Editors Paul Schrimpf and Eric Sfiligoj talk about upcoming trade shows and events and review the Mid America CropLife Association Read More
Industry NewsVerdesian Life Sciences Appoints New CEO
September 19, 2016
Verdesian Life Sciences, a plant health and nutrition company, today announced that its board of directors has named Kenneth M. Avery Read More
Corn
Crop InputsEPA Settles With Syngenta For Alleged Multi-Regional Pe…
September 19, 2016
The U.S. EPA has announced a multi-region settlement with Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC (Syngenta) in Greensboro, NC, for alleged violations of Read More
ManagementMerger Mania
September 16, 2016
Editors Paul Schrimpf and Eric Sfiligoj discuss this week’s mega-ag mergers of Bayer and Monsanto and Potash and Agrium. Read More
Monsanto sign
Crop InputsMonsanto Ends Up Being A Bargain For Bayer
September 16, 2016
History will say Bayer got a bargain in its $66 billion purchase of Monsanto, writes David Nicklaus, St. Louis Post-Dispatch. The Read More
Greg Musson, Gar Tootelian
CropLife 100California Ag Retailer Steps Up To Feed Families Affect…
September 16, 2016
GAR Tootelian, Inc. (GAR) in Reedley, CA, is challenging the Central Valley to help raise enough money and provide 525,000 meals Read More
Crop InputsBayer, Monsanto CEOs Discuss Merger
September 15, 2016
Werner Baumann, Bayer CEO, and Hugh Grant, Monsanto CEO, discuss why they decided to merge their companies. Read More
Corn close up
Crop InputsNY Times: Bayer-Monsanto a Bad Deal for Farmers
September 15, 2016
Via NY Times: Don Halcomb, a 63-year-old farmer in Adairville, KY, is expecting his profit to vanish this year, largely Read More