Big Win For Agriculture In Des Moines Water Works Case

Big Win For Agriculture In Des Moines Water Works Case

The Iowa Supreme Court has ruled that the three counties being sued by the Des Moines Water Works are immune from damage claims, writes Kyle Liske on the Agricultural Retailers Association website.

Advertisement

The Des Moines Water Works sued 10 drainage districts in the Iowa counties of Sac, Calhoun, and Buena Vista in federal court alleging the illegal discharge of pollutants into the Raccoon River, which is Des Moines’ primary source of drinking water.

The county defendants moved the federal court to dismiss the lawsuit because drainage districts have been statutorily immune from lawsuits for more than a century. The federal court asked the Iowa Supreme Court to decide whether the drainage districts and counties were immune from the lawsuits. Today’s opinion reaffirms immunity for the drainage districts and counties.

“This is a big win for Iowa drainage districts and the agricultural community nationwide,” said Steve Nielsen, General Counsel for United Suppliers, Inc. which is headquartered in Ames, IA. “Bill Stowe and the Des Moines Water Works are essentially asking a judge to re-write the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Water Act, which would change well-established policy and set a dangerous precedent. Since its inception, the CWA has defined farm runoff as a non-point source, similar to storm water, and exempted drainage districts from liability. Any change to that exemption would subject farmers to a burdensome and totally unnecessary permitting process.”

The Iowa Supreme Court opinion does not resolve the federal Clean Water Act issues still before the federal district court. However, previous rulings and established regulations suggest any federal decision would favor drainage districts.

Should the federal court rule in favor of DMWW, drainage districts could be subject to permitting under the CWA, but it will not be able to collect damages from the drainage districts or the counties. The drainage districts and DMWW are slated to go to federal court in late June.

Leave a Reply

CropLife Lib says:

Bill Stowe got Trump’d!

CropLife Lib says:

Is this really a “Big Win” though? I mean, YAYYY, drainage districts can dump all the N in the water they want now, without fear of financial repercussions from the municipalities that have to treat and clean the N-contaminated water for the public. HOORAY!

Dan Schrag says:

I am tired of this, and anti GMO and “only organically grown” folks and the Proposition 13 Californians dictating to the rest of the world how we should grow our food. Would also love to see President Trump repeal the Clean Water Act permitting requirements concerning the use of SAFE aquatic herbicides. Growers are some of the most conscientious “environmentalists” you will ever know.