State Of Precision

The last year has been a test for retailers and growers alike, as they look for more tools to offset input and crop price uncertainties. The editors of CropLife® magazine wanted to see how precision agriculture fared amidst the turmoil, so we surveyed more than 2,000 dealership readers — with special emphasis in Corn Belt states — to gauge their use of the technologies. We also talked personally with a dozen retailers and consultants to delve a little deeper for their perspectives. The news was pretty good for 2009-10: More growers see that precision ag can help them gain efficiency — and profits.

“We’ve found that when farm economics are tightest is actually the time we have the best demand,” says Dan Frieberg, president of precision ag data processor Premier Crop Systems LLC, West Des Moines, IA. “People care a lot more about managing when things are tight.”

And Steve Cubbage, president of Record Harvest Enterprises, Nevada, MO, reports that even though fertilizer prices have moderated in recent months, soil sampling and nutrient variable-rate technologies (VRT) continue to grow. He’s also seen a significant increase in adoption of seeding prescriptions with more growers purchasing new planters or retrofitted older ones with not only row clutch control but also variable-rate drives.

Of Signals And Profits

Our surveyed dealers are offering different levels of service bundles, which can include grid soil sampling, variable-rate maps, variable-rate application of fertilizer and lime, variable-rate seeding prescriptions, and yield mapping. They’re using equipment from many manufacturers, and most say no one company can meet all their needs. Plus, they may be lending tech support on components that grower-customers are using themselves.

They’re generally pleased with the quality of GPS correction and signals, though work is still getting stalled by downtimes. Lane Pickwell, precision ag manager with Hintzsche Fertilizer, Maple Park, IL, is frustrated that he simply can’t help his drivers when they call in saying their autosteer’s not working because WAAS has gone out, usually for about 10-15 minutes.

Some respondents, such as Sid Parks, manager of precision farming with GROWMARK, are utilizing multiple signal sources — including Coast Guard Beacon, WAAS, OmniSTAR, GreenStar, and RTK — while others have found that WAAS is still good enough to meet their accuracy needs.

Indeed, Steve Clement with the precision ag division at Brandt Con­solidated, Springfield, IL, has found WAAS is good enough for tillage, but “as we get into planting, harvesting, and strip-till applications, most growers want something better than WAAS,” he says. He adds that RTK has been a favorite among a lot of his growers, though coverage can be an issue, and Brandt is continuing to expand its RTK networks. “Some growers start out with OmniSTAR and later upgrade to RTK, mainly to help spread out the cost a bit,” he says.

“We’re satisfied with how current signals are working as long as our employees and customers understand the limitations of each one — what application each one fits — and don’t expect more accuracy and repeatability than each one can deliver,” says Glen Franzluebbers, technology director with Central Valley Ag, Oakland, NE.

Ceres Solutions LLP, Perrysville, IN, implemented GLONASS capability at all of its RTK network bases last year — and it’s been a huge benefit to customers during times of low GPS satellite coverage, says Jason Stonecipher, technology manager.

In terms of hardware, Cubbage sees a serious shift in focus. “In the past few years, autosteer technologies have been the shining star of the precision arena — but that has changed. It’s all about integration of technologies that relate back to the agronomic basics and the bottom line,” he says. “GPS auto­steer technology drove us back to where we need to be in precision agriculture, and that is in the data and management pieces.”

When assessing the profitability of precision services, Stonecipher believes it’s tough to cover the costs of the people and equipment it takes to effectively do the work. He says margins are tight in this segment, as they are in the rest of retail ag. “You have to be very detail-oriented to make sure everything balances,” he says.

Brandt’s Clement says, “We feel precision services have given us an edge over the competition. Being able to provide data management, VRA, and precision equipment, we can grow the business in other areas.”

Ronan Cummins, Opti-Crop division sales lead at Miles Farm Supply, Owensboro, KY, notes that the company has picked up quite a bit of service work taking precision soil samples and creating prescription layers for growers. Why? The marked increase in grower-owned spreaders in the past two years, with growers looking for the flexibility their own equipment offers in purchasing fertilizer.

Each year the staff at Cooperative Pro­ducers Inc., Axtell, NE, ensures the company has a reasonable margin built into its programs to make them self-sustaining, with a little extra to experiment with new applications. “We’re working to have precision ag as a separate department, and making it more profitable rather than just being a service we can provide to our customers,” explains Tyrell Fickenscher, precision ag coordinator.

Hintzsche’s Pickwell puts it simply for his company: Precision services may not be a huge profit generator, but they help the company sell more fertilizer and chemicals. And most growers don’t seem to be balking at any extra costs for variable-rate services. “They know they’re putting their fertilizer where it’s doing them the most good,” he says.

Managing The Data

Many dealers interviewed feel that only a marginal percentage of growers (estimates ranged from 10% to 25%) are using field data to make informed decisions. What’s the problem? Issues such as limited knowledge of how to use it, inconsistent or poor data collection from yield monitors, and system or data compatibility issues.

Brian Hunt, Precision Points manager, All Points Cooperative, Gothenburg, NE, says many of his customers have yield monitors but are not logging the data because it’s a lot more work than they originally thought.

Indeed, Pickwell has found that growers have a lot of data, and they might look at it for five minutes — but never again. They go out and do the same bad things year after year, he says. He’s heard comments such as “I bought a combine and this damn thing [yield monitor] came with it. I don’t know how to use it.” Pickwell responds with, “Well, the monitor’s the best thing you’ve got, here’s what it’s telling you.” He tries to explain to them that it’s an agronomic ally telling what’s really going on in fields.

In fact, Ceres’ Stonecipher says his firm recently restructured its yield mapping services to encourage more clients to take advantage of yield data in their decision-making processes. “We have lots of yield monitors in combines, but there are many that are not being used to their full potential,” he says.

Retailers didn’t necessarily pass judgment on customers for their lack of data savvy. “Our role is to sort through their information, separating good from bad, and to collect good data through our services,” says Franzluebbers. “We analyze, combine, and create a usable product for them in the form of variable-rate prescriptions.” He says his company also organizes their layers of data to help them make other informed management decisions.

Brandt’s Clement estimates that as many as 50% to 60% of his company’s growers are using a portion of their data to make decisions. They’re utilizing yield maps to compare hybrids or hybrid maps to compare tillage, population, and the like.

Clement and Parks have found some growers can collect, store, and analyze their own data, but the largest number of them would prefer someone to either help or manage this data for them — which makes for an ideal service opportunity for retailers.

Stonecipher says his customers are also using data to locate areas of poor performance in fields. For instance, the information generated in his region often shows water-related problems, and he recommends tile where it can be justified.

“One of the bigger drivers for use of this data comes through government programs in which growers are required to report what was done to a field in order to qualify for enhancement dollars,” says Fickenscher.

Several retailers agreed that the lack of a data standard is holding producers back in decision-making. “This will continue to be a problem until hardware manufacturers adopt a standard for data entry,” says Cubbage. “Otherwise, analyzing data will only become more of a headache as collected data piles up.”

The goal would be software that provides a standard “format” for entering seed varieties, crop protection products, and seed treatment. Producers and retailers can then compare “apples to apples.” (To that end, Cubbage works with the AgX Platform, a standardized database created by SST Software for use in agricultural GIS data collection. It’s available to all precision ag hardware and software companies for adoption, and readers can find more information at www.agxplatform.com.)

“Until retailers work to promote this with their growers and demand such a standard from hardware manufacturers, this industry will be stuck chasing its tail for years to come,” Cubbage says.

Variable-Rate Results

Hunt says All Points’ variable-rate program has grown exponentially since its beginning four years ago. The first year the company’s leadership had hoped to apply 10,000 acres with the technology — and wound up doing 30,000. Recent totals put the number at nearly 70,000 acres.

Why the boom? Phenomenal cost savings for customers, says Hunt. “And on the fertilizer, we’re still pulling off record yields using the same, if not less, fertilizer.” Some customers have also turned to doing multiple applications of nutrients, instead of putting them all out up front. The change in timing has seen yield responses.

Hunt doesn’t want to overwhelm clients. “Were just trying to slip in and take care of the variability for them. A lot of times it’s just an extra dry application, variable-rating three different products all at once, and you’re done,” he explains.

Cummins saw the fertilizer price spikes of 2008 kick-starting “the whole VR nutrients complex” in his region. Variable-rate P, K, and anhydrous ammonia (NH3) are now common practices among his grower group, and VR seeding has taken a foothold as farmers trade up to newer VR-capable planting equipment.

Clement says his company has done a fair amount of variable-rate NH3 and seed population over the last few years. “A lot of the new equipment is VR-capable and makes using these technologies an easy transition. But grower confidence in the technology can sometimes be a hurdle.”

Frieberg has seen a surge in variable-rate application among Premier Crop’s Midwest clients, but the growth is “not universal. There are as many companies going backwards and standing still as there are going forward. The companies we’re working with are growing, but it’s with a lot of effort.”

CPI’s Fickenscher has seen a significant increase in the number of growers who are using VRA themselves to variably plant and fertilize. He points out that many growers already have the equipment necessary, but are not sure how it works, how to start using it, how it will affect their bottom line, and who to go to for help.

In yet another vital new use for VR technology, Fickenscher says his firm is teaming with neighboring Crop­Metrics of North Bend, NE, to get variable-rate irrigation up and running in the region.

Cubbage believes VRT is being held back by the fact that hardware companies have provided new tools, but growers are not fully trained in how to use them. “It’s sort of like giving someone a stick of dynamite and a match,” he says. Used properly, the tools can be productive, but used incorrectly, they can have long-lasting effects on production. “Prescription VRT maps should not be treated like a three-year-old’s coloring book where you just randomly choose the color of crayon on a whim,” says Cubbage. “There needs to be agronomy, analysis, and consultation in most cases.”

Barriers To Adoption

Precision agriculture still faces a host of challenges:

Time. It takes time to use data to make decisions, emphasizes Frieberg. “And there’s a terrific pressure on the system to do it fast. Retailers and people who sell inputs to farmers are still the trusted advisors, but there’s terrific pressure on them to sell more. If you have eight sales calls to make in a day, it just doesn’t leave time to analyze, plan, and execute site-specific agriculture,” he says.

“It’s a whole lot easier to throw up your hands, pretend every field is uniform and spread 300 pounds of 9-23-30 on every acre,” Frieberg points out. He understands this shotgun approach — if a dealer’s or grower’s goal is to get a lot of tons out, it’s “pretty darn efficient to just spread a few hundred pounds of the same analysis every year.”

Personnel and training. Many of our precision experts said there’s just not enough of them to go around. Justin Welch, ag technology manager, Co-Alliance LLP, Danville, IN, says he’s heard, “There’s not enough Justins” many times, and says “my job should be the agronomic part of VR – it should not be to teach every grower how to run his monitor to actually make it work!”

“The people in the technology department are not typical ag employees,” adds Stonecipher. “They need to have a special skill set — part techno-geek, part mechanic, part researcher, part cowboy.”

Frieberg would say there’s a skilled labor crisis in agriculture across the board. “We try and squeeze more productivity out of people. We keep stretching these talented people further and there’s a terrific pressure as margins get tighter to sell more.”

In particular, dealers have found it’s a drain on profitability for precision staff to have to support hardware that growers purchased elsewhere. Some help can be done over the phone, and in growers’ eyes, it’s very hard to charge for that. “They don’t realize it’s the same as working on a tractor in the shop down at the local iron dealer,” says Cubbage.

Compatibility of systems and data. Communication among precision components has been an issue for years, as discussed above. All Points Coop’s Hunt says that when he started using precision technology four years ago, he had to use four different programs to get one result. Now he’s relieved to be down to two. But, he admits, “everybody’s operation is slightly different and there’s not one program or machine that can do everything you need.”

Growers. Growers erect a number of barriers when it comes to precision ag adoption, our respondents agreed. “Some older producers don’t believe a VR machine can do that, they don’t believe a satellite can tell them what their field is doing,” says Hunt. He admits his own company tried to disprove the technology some seven years ago. But it worked, and All Points tries to convince customers one step at a time. “Today we go out to growers and say, ‘Trust me. Give me one field and trust me,'” Hunt says.

Growers may be ready to adopt technology, but “some in the hardware industry are treating it more like a commodity,” says Cubbage. He emphasizes the products are management tools — it’s not like buying disks or plows — and the price competition on the hardware side makes it difficult to have the margin to properly train and educate customers in the features and benefits of a product.

Pickwell has found some precision equipment manufacturers will promise growers “that a system will do all this stuff — but it can’t, because it’s just not made to.” He winds up at clients’ houses, sometimes into the night, showing them how to do tasks — or showing them product limitations. Stonecipher reports similar problems: “We see growers almost every day who have been sold a bill of goods and cannot get support or answers they need after the sale.” Such bad experiences sour growers on precision technologies.

Frieberg views the frustrated do-it-yourselfers as “the low hanging fruit in the market. Usually after they’ve tried it a few years, they are just so anxious to have someone help them.” He says there are many sharp, college-educated growers — who have technical expertise like never before — but will very gladly partner with somebody who brings additional expertise to the table.

Keeping up with changes. Retailers and consultants say it’s very challenging to keep up with all the changes in the precision industry. And the environment of innovation, consolidation, and shifts within precision companies is unsettling to buyers, says Cubbage.

“It’s overwhelming,” says Pickwell. “I have to work with all the manufacturers because our customers have just about everything.”

Cost. Some growers still operate solely on price, says Stonecipher. They won’t move on adopting precision ag, even though value-added programs like Ceres Solutions’ AgVantage consulting services go well beyond just soil sampling and try to tie in as much information about the farm as possible. “We run into cases where the farmer who is ‘cost-conscious’ may not find value in the information and advantages of VRA,” he says.

Retailers we talked with were excited about new precision technologies hitting the scene or under development.

Wireless data transfer/telemetry. Many of our dealer respondents were keenly interested in this technology, and some are starting to work with new products in this area, including John Deere‘s AgLogic and Raven‘s Slingshot. This season, 35 trucks at Co-Alliance are using Farmworks’ telemetry system to transmit prescriptions and retrieve as-applied data, reports Welch.

Getting data to a machine can sometimes cause big holdups for Pickwell, who currently sends operators out with memory sticks. He says wireless transfer would help — and he’d like to use the technology to coordinate the logistics of rigs as well: “We’ve got floaters meeting on the road, and we shouldn’t.”

Stonecipher appreciates the efficiency wireless could bring to the business, especially as his company covers larger geographies from fewer locations.

As with many dealers, Cummins at Miles Farm Supply is disappointed that cell phone signals and remote Internet access continue to be a problem for his area, limiting the company’s ability to add telemetry systems or simply e-mail files out to a truck in the field. He says he’s not seen an integrated solution he likes yet, meaning a system that works and complements back-office operations such as tracking product, real-time billing, scheduling and dispatch of equipment, and getting personnel and materials to the next job. For him, all segments would be linked to inventory control and ultimately, billing.

Cubbage believes this telemetry will offer the next big efficiency breakthroughs in precision ag. But again, he factors in the lack of data standardization when assessing the value of wireless data transfer. “If each hardware company thinks that data collected has to be wirelessly beamed only to their server where a grower has an account, that’s just not going to work,” he explains. “You wind up with relevant data stored on multiple servers on multiple accounts. Wireless transfer will either transform our industry for the good or it will end up being a Pandora’s Box.”

CORS/VRS networks and improved GPS options. “They’re some of the most talked-about technologies among our customers,” says Franzluebbers.

“And VRS networks would give us the possibility of coverage in areas currently not covered with RTK,” adds Clement.

Cubbage says these networks will be the next evolution in RTK technology, but the tough part is, again, going to be compatibility among hardware manufacturers.

Crop sensors. These units still seem to be getting a lukewarm reception by the retailers we talked with. Cubbage sees them as a growing market, but it will take education and trained agronomists to implement adoption on a larger basis.

Says All Points’ Hunt, “I think the technology is sound, but the practicality is not there yet.” The on-the-go sensor units he’s looked at simply go way too slow. With almost $300,000 to $400,000 wrapped up in a machine it has to cover lots of acres. Plus, he says the equipment poses logistical questions, such as how much fertilizer to load. “Because it’s real-time application, how much do we send out there?” he asks.

Leave a Reply

Precision Ag Stories

The Tule ET sensor in wine grapes.
Precision AgTule Technologies: Monitoring Water Stress Can Unlock Potential
February 2, 2016
Although we mostly stick to the things we know around these parts (corn and beans), we’ve strayed from the traditional Read More
SST Analytics
Precision AgSST Analytics Helps Ag Retailers Navigate Down Economy
January 21, 2016
The next few years may be tough for ag retailers. High yields continue to depress grain prices while the global Read More
Casey Niemann AgriSync
Precision AgAgriSync App Named Finalist In AFB Competition
January 18, 2016
An Iowa-based agriculture technology startup company, AgriSync, participated in the American Farm Bureau Federation Rural Entrepreneurship Challenge. They were one Read More
Trimble FmX TMX-2050 Field-IQ SwitchBoxes
Precision AgRate Controllers Tied To More Precision Tasks
December 11, 2015
Rate controllers reduce input costs — bottom line — and every grower is looking for ways to decrease seed and Read More
Top 100 Articles
Elburn Cooperative
CropLife 100Elburn Cooperative Members Vote To Join CHS
December 28, 2015
With 81% of eligible producers voting, 94% cast an affirmative ballot for Elburn Cooperative, a diversified agricultural retailer based out Read More
West Central Cooperative, Jefferson, IA
CropLife 100Farmers Cooperative-West Central Merger Approved
December 21, 2015
The members of Farmers Cooperative Co. (FC), Ames, IA, and West Central Cooperative, Ralston, IA, have both approved the merger Read More
Wheat Growers Innovation Center, Bath, SD
CropLife 100Wheat Growers Opens Innovation Center
December 21, 2015
Wheat Growers’ commitment in providing its farmer-owners with the latest in technological advancements now has a one-of-a-kind focal point, as Read More
CropLife 100ARA Selects The Andersons As 2015 Retailer Of The Year
December 9, 2015
The Agricultural Retailers Association today named Maumee, OH-based The Andersons as its Retailer of the Year for 2015. The award Read More
CPS Washington Court House John Deere Sprayer
CropLife 100Application Equipment Report: It Is Easy Being Green For Top 100 Ag Retailers
December 5, 2015
On The Muppets television show, Kermit the Frog is famous for singing a song about the troubles he encounters in Read More
Fertilizer Bin
CropLife 100Fertilizer Sales: Another Down Year For Top 100 Ag Retailers
December 4, 2015
In pure number terms, the fertilizer category still dominates all crop inputs/services among CropLife 100 ag retailers. In 2015, for Read More
Latest News
Soybean field
FungicidesFour Arysta Fungicide Formulations Given FIFRA Approval…
February 8, 2016
Arysta LifeScience North America recently announced the issuance of Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 2(ee) Recommendations for Read More
FungicidesAgri-Fos Systemic Fungicide Plus Receives EPA Registrat…
February 8, 2016
Vivid Life Sciences has announced the EPA registration of Agri-Fos Systemic Fungicide Plus, a highly concentrated active ingredient phosphite fungicide, Read More
Crop InputsBayer Contests EPA’s Decision On Valuable Insecticide F…
February 5, 2016
Crop Science, a division of Bayer, has announced it has refused a request by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to Read More
Wheat Field North Dakota
Seed/BiotechSyngenta Wins Seed Fraud Suit Against South Dakota Grow…
February 5, 2016
Syngenta has obtained a $25,000 settlement from Paul and John Mayclin, Mayclin Farms, Plankinton, SD, in response to their Plant Read More
ManagementOABA Annual Conference Wraps Up In Columbus
February 5, 2016
More than 300 Ohio AgriBusiness Association (OABA) members and industry professionals were on hand to engage in collaborative learning and Read More
Crop InputsBayer To Contest EPA Flubendiamide Decision
February 5, 2016
Crop Science, a division of Bayer, announced today it has refused a request by EPA to voluntarily cancel the uses Read More
Syngenta
Seed/BiotechNot So Fast: ChemChina Syngenta Takeover Could Draw Nat…
February 5, 2016
State-owned China National Chemical Corp. (ChemChina), which plans to buy Swiss seeds and pesticide maker Syngenta, will promptly start preparations Read More
Rendering of Syngenta Seedcare Institute expansion
Seed/BiotechExpansion Of Syngenta’s North America Seedcare In…
February 4, 2016
As demand for seed treatment knowledge and products grows among farmers, retailers and others in the seed industry, Syngenta is Read More
Soybean Field
Industry NewsArysta LifeScience Strengthens Sales Team
February 4, 2016
Arysta LifeScience North America recently announced three new personnel additions: Jake Cook and Peter White are Territory Sales Managers for Read More
Davor Pisk Syngenta COO
Crop InputsSyngenta COO: Why ChemChina Offer Beat Monsanto’s
February 4, 2016
Syngenta Chief Operating Officer Davor Pisk says he is confident the proposed acquisition by ChemChina will ultimately help preserve choice Read More
Young corn plants in soil
Crop InputsKoch Biological Solutions Invests In Pathway Biologic
February 4, 2016
An affiliate of Koch Biological Solutions, LLC has acquired a minority equity position in, and entered into collaboration with, Pathway Read More
Crop InputsABG: China Signs Off On Monsanto’s Roundup Ready …
February 3, 2016
Monsanto Co. on Wednesday announced it plans to launch its Roundup Ready 2 Xtend soybeans in time for the 2016 Read More
Syngenta headquarters in Basel, Switzerland
Crop Inputs6 Things To Know About The ChemChina-Syngenta Deal
February 3, 2016
After months of rumors and speculation, Syngenta has announced that ChemChina has offered to acquire the Swiss-based company. “In making Read More
FertilizerPhosphorus: Is Band Or Broadcast Application The Better…
February 3, 2016
Is band or broadcast application the better method when it comes to phosphorus? The answer to this question depends mostly Read More
Syngenta Sign
Crop InputsChemChina Nearing Deal To Buy Syngenta For Record $43 B…
February 3, 2016
China National Chemical Corp. is nearing an agreement to buy Swiss pesticide-and-seeds-maker Syngenta AG for about 43.7 billion francs ($42.8 Read More
Herbicides2015 ASA Trials Demonstrate Valent Fierce XLT Herbicide…
February 2, 2016
Valent U.S.A. today announced that new Fierce XLT Soybean Herbicide ranks in the top tier among growers for length of Read More
Crop Protection Products in storage
Paul SchrimpfCrop Input Selling: Return Of The Price List
February 2, 2016
It was a good 15 years ago, shortly after I first started writing for this esteemed publication, that it all Read More
Potash storage at Growmark
FertilizerThe Phosphate And Potash Outlook For 2016
February 2, 2016
Like other commodities, prices of the leading plant nutrient products dropped sharply in 2015. At this writing, the price of Read More