Key Takeaways From Agritechnica: A Q&A With Farm Science Review Manager Chuck Gamble

Chuck Gamble, manager of the Farm Science Review, visits with Jerry Roell, director of John Deere FarmSight, at Agritechnica 2013.
Chuck Gamble, manager of the Farm Science Review, visits with Jerry Roell, director of John Deere FarmSight, at Agritechnica 2013.

Chuck Gamble, manager of the Farm Science Review, recently attended Agritechnica, the world’s largest exhibition for agricultural machinery, in Hanover, Germany. Traveling with a group of agricultural engineers from various universities across the U.S. and New Zealand attending their annual international conference, Gamble had the opportunity to visit with other managers of both domestic and European farm shows, tour agricultural facilities specific to Germany and network with agriculture enthusiasts from all over the world.

Gamble shares his takeaways from European agriculture and how the success of Agritechnica can be applied to the Farm Science Review:

Q. Why is it beneficial to attend other farm shows as the manager of the Farm Science Review?
A. Peer review is the best way for all farm shows to improve, to create the best format or venue for the farm attendees and our exhibitors. There is not one perfect farm show, but we can observe our peers at work, take note and decide if this or that practice might make our own show better. The Farm Science Review is all about heading toward world-class and doing what it takes to get there.

Q. What is the biggest difference between farm shows in the U.S. compared to farm shows in Europe?
A. The farm shows in the U.S. have always focused on agricultural equipment. In the European Union, farm shows focus on either equipment or livestock, or a combination of both. Don’t get me wrong, you may see livestock at U.S. farm shows, but it is only a small component. Livestock may be more prominent at European farm shows because many of the major breeds of livestock originated in Europe.

Q. What were some of the key takeaways from Agritechnica about agriculture in general?
A. The agricultural economy in Germany and the surrounding region must be very robust compared to that of the U.S. I say this because the exhibitor displays at Agritechnica were very elaborate and there was a heavy focus on technology. You can tell that European manufacturers take great pride in the region’s technological development. Since Europe’s cropping systems aren’t too different from ours, European farm shows have to be international in terms of technology and equipment or they won’t be successful.

Q. What will you share with your staff and supporters of the Farm Science Review from Agritechnica?
A. The Agritechnica venue is impossible to duplicate; the 28 buildings covering 85 indoor acres are top-notch. The World’s Fair was held at the facility in 2000. It was evident the Agritechnica management pays close attention to detail, like we do at the Farm Science Review! And, the international contacts I made were valuable. If an international company wanted to market in the U.S., we have the venue to do so in Ohio. I did discover that an India-based tractor manufacturer, Mahindra, who is making great strides in smaller horsepower tractors, did not participate in Agritechnica, but they do exhibit at the Farm Science Review!

Q. What did you take away from Agritechnica that can be applied to the Farm Science Review?
A. There is a thought in the farm show industry that a large international component is required to be successful. But I don’t think this is necessarily true in the U.S. Relatively speaking, farmers will only travel so far to visit a show. As we look at marketing regions across the United States, regional farm shows satisfy the marketing need for many exhibitors.

One important difference at Agritechnica was the categorization of exhibitors (i.e., putting exhibitors with similar products or services in the same area). In some cases, this set-up works, but in other situations, it does not. Some exhibitors want to be close to their competition while others want to be in the opposite corner of the grounds. The Farm Science Review has not yet dictated where exhibitors are located. Over the years, some industry-specific exhibitors have migrated toward the same quadrant because they have chosen to be located close together. The other concern is if you have harvesters located in one building, hay equipment in another building and sprayers in another, some manufacturers would need multiple exhibits at the show, which is not very practical and most choose not to do so.

One practice the Farm Science Review quite possibly might adopt is the use of technology (scanners) at admission gates. Exhibitors want a record of who attended from a demographic standpoint. This technology would allow us to give exhibitors the information they would want to know to determine their return on investment (ROI) from participating at the Farm Science Review.

Farm Science Review is sponsored by The Ohio State University College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, Ohio State University Extension, and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center. It attracts more than 130,000 visitors from all over the country and Canada, who come for three days to peruse 4,000 product lines from 600 commercial exhibitors, and learn the latest in agricultural research, conservation, family and nutrition, and gardening and landscape.

Leave a Reply

Equipment Stories

Adams Decline Weigh Blender
BlendersFertilizer Blenders Take On Latest Additives, Heavy Workloads
February 2, 2016
As agronomy and precision ag sciences continue to advance, blender manufacturers have certainly had their part to play. “We are Read More
The Tule ET sensor in wine grapes.
Precision AgTule Technologies: Monitoring Water Stress Can Unlock Potential
February 2, 2016
Although we mostly stick to the things we know around these parts (corn and beans), we’ve strayed from the traditional Read More
Wacker Neuson WL34
EquipmentWacker Neuson: A Big Reputation With A Small Stature
February 2, 2016
Many observers to the agricultural marketplace might not know the name Wacker Neuson, Menomonee Falls, WI. While the company is Read More
MixMate from Praxidyn
BlendersPraxidyn Introduces Portable Ag Chemical Blending System
January 28, 2016
Praxidyn has introduced Mixmate – the portable agricultural chemical blending system. Mixmate streamlines or completely automates the mixing process with Read More
Top 100 Articles
Elburn Cooperative
CropLife 100Elburn Cooperative Members Vote To Join CHS
December 28, 2015
With 81% of eligible producers voting, 94% cast an affirmative ballot for Elburn Cooperative, a diversified agricultural retailer based out Read More
West Central Cooperative, Jefferson, IA
CropLife 100Farmers Cooperative-West Central Merger Approved
December 21, 2015
The members of Farmers Cooperative Co. (FC), Ames, IA, and West Central Cooperative, Ralston, IA, have both approved the merger Read More
Wheat Growers Innovation Center, Bath, SD
CropLife 100Wheat Growers Opens Innovation Center
December 21, 2015
Wheat Growers’ commitment in providing its farmer-owners with the latest in technological advancements now has a one-of-a-kind focal point, as Read More
CropLife 100ARA Selects The Andersons As 2015 Retailer Of The Year
December 9, 2015
The Agricultural Retailers Association today named Maumee, OH-based The Andersons as its Retailer of the Year for 2015. The award Read More
CPS Washington Court House John Deere Sprayer
CropLife 100Application Equipment Report: It Is Easy Being Green For Top 100 Ag Retailers
December 5, 2015
On The Muppets television show, Kermit the Frog is famous for singing a song about the troubles he encounters in Read More
Fertilizer Bin
CropLife 100Fertilizer Sales: Another Down Year For Top 100 Ag Retailers
December 4, 2015
In pure number terms, the fertilizer category still dominates all crop inputs/services among CropLife 100 ag retailers. In 2015, for Read More
Latest News
Crop InputsMarrone Bio Innovations Submits New Bio-Fungicide For E…
February 9, 2016
Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. (MBI) today announced that it has submitted a new biological fungicide (MBI-110) to EPA. The broad spectrum Read More
Crop InputsWeed Expert: Adding A Second Herbicide Not Always Easy
February 9, 2016
In my last post, I reviewed some recent research that suggests one of the best ways to delay the evolution Read More
Crop InputsGenetic Literacy Project: Farmers Need More Herbicide C…
February 9, 2016
There are two things that I think just about every weed scientist can agree on, writes Andrew Kniss for The Read More
HerbicidesWeed Expert Warns North Dakota Growers Of Coming Herbic…
February 9, 2016
Ford Baldwin painted a bleak picture of weed control at a recent workshop here exploring the future of ag production, Read More
HerbicidesWSSA Announces New, Updated Free Web Resources
February 9, 2016
Today the Weed Science Society of American (WSSA) announced that new and updated educational materials for both weed scientists and Read More
Soybean field
FungicidesFour Arysta Fungicide Formulations Given FIFRA Approval…
February 8, 2016
Arysta LifeScience North America recently announced the issuance of Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 2(ee) Recommendations for Read More
FungicidesAgri-Fos Systemic Fungicide Plus Receives EPA Registrat…
February 8, 2016
Vivid Life Sciences has announced the EPA registration of Agri-Fos Systemic Fungicide Plus, a highly concentrated active ingredient phosphite fungicide, Read More
Crop InputsBayer Contests EPA’s Decision On Valuable Insecticide F…
February 5, 2016
Crop Science, a division of Bayer, has announced it has refused a request by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to Read More
Wheat Field North Dakota
Seed/BiotechSyngenta Wins Seed Fraud Suit Against South Dakota Grow…
February 5, 2016
Syngenta has obtained a $25,000 settlement from Paul and John Mayclin, Mayclin Farms, Plankinton, SD, in response to their Plant Read More
ManagementOABA Annual Conference Wraps Up In Columbus
February 5, 2016
More than 300 Ohio AgriBusiness Association (OABA) members and industry professionals were on hand to engage in collaborative learning and Read More
Crop InputsBayer To Contest EPA Flubendiamide Decision
February 5, 2016
Crop Science, a division of Bayer, announced today it has refused a request by EPA to voluntarily cancel the uses Read More
Syngenta
Seed/BiotechNot So Fast: ChemChina Syngenta Takeover Could Draw Nat…
February 5, 2016
State-owned China National Chemical Corp. (ChemChina), which plans to buy Swiss seeds and pesticide maker Syngenta, will promptly start preparations Read More
Rendering of Syngenta Seedcare Institute expansion
Seed/BiotechExpansion Of Syngenta’s North America Seedcare In…
February 4, 2016
As demand for seed treatment knowledge and products grows among farmers, retailers and others in the seed industry, Syngenta is Read More
Soybean Field
Industry NewsArysta LifeScience Strengthens Sales Team
February 4, 2016
Arysta LifeScience North America recently announced three new personnel additions: Jake Cook and Peter White are Territory Sales Managers for Read More
Davor Pisk Syngenta COO
Crop InputsSyngenta COO: Why ChemChina Offer Beat Monsanto’s
February 4, 2016
Syngenta Chief Operating Officer Davor Pisk says he is confident the proposed acquisition by ChemChina will ultimately help preserve choice Read More
Young corn plants in soil
Crop InputsKoch Biological Solutions Invests In Pathway Biologic
February 4, 2016
An affiliate of Koch Biological Solutions, LLC has acquired a minority equity position in, and entered into collaboration with, Pathway Read More
Crop InputsABG: China Signs Off On Monsanto’s Roundup Ready …
February 3, 2016
Monsanto Co. on Wednesday announced it plans to launch its Roundup Ready 2 Xtend soybeans in time for the 2016 Read More
Syngenta headquarters in Basel, Switzerland
Crop Inputs6 Things To Know About The ChemChina-Syngenta Deal
February 3, 2016
After months of rumors and speculation, Syngenta has announced that ChemChina has offered to acquire the Swiss-based company. “In making Read More