Phosphorus: Is Band Or Broadcast Application The Better Method?

Is band or broadcast application the better method when it comes to phosphorus? The answer to this question depends mostly on the soil phosphorus status, according to Penn State Extension. On soils with optimum to high levels of phosphorus, banding has less advantage and broadcast applications are generally adequate (sometimes superior to banding).

Row crops in general, and corn in particular, appear to yield better when soils contain relatively high levels of phosphorus throughout the rooting profile.

Advertisement

In tests with the recommended phosphorus application split between band and broadcast, versus all by one method, the maximum yields have been obtained with a combination. The advantage to building up the general soil level of phosphorus is probably due to the need of all roots to take up some phosphorus; while banding near the seed can reduce fixation and increase uptake early in the season.

Top Articles
Best Agriculture Apps for 2024 (Update)

Small grains, on the other hand, have limited rooting systems and thus less capacity to explore soil. In addition, they are short-season crops and often grown in cooler temperatures. Therefore, phosphorus placement seems more critical for small grains than for row crops. Greater yield response to banded phosphorus is common, especially on low phosphorus soils or soils with a greater ability to fix phosphorus. Recommendations of incorporated broadcast phosphorus for small grains have frequently been higher than if the phosphorus were banded, because higher soil phosphorus levels compensate for reduced phosphorus uptake ability of the crop. Where soils are built up to optimum or above phosphorus levels, however, banded or broadcast-P can be equally effective.

Read the full story on Penn State Extension.

1

Leave a Reply

Avatar for George Rehm George Rehm says:

The question of band vs. broadcast has been researched for many tears at many locations. The choice does depend on soil test values. We’ve fortunately moved away from the “build plus Maintenance” philosophy which was extremely expensive. Now, we use a band plus broadcast approach if soil test values are low. Otherwise, band applications of immobile nutrients are perfectly satisfactory and have environmental advantages.

Banding Phosphorus instead of shotgunning it was the first thing I remember being taught by the U of M back in 1971. for us this hasn’t changed other than we keep any application in the top 4″ of soil to no more than 16 pounds so as to not reduce Mycorrhizal symbiosis.

Large numbers of yield response experiments give mixed answers to the question of band versus broadcast. But runoff studies give a clear answer to the question of what happens when phosphorus is left on the soil surface. For example, this study indicated that banding monoammonium phosphate below the surface decreased soluble phosphorus loading by 98%. https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ael/articles/1/1/150015

Advertisement
Advertisement