CF Industries’ Board Of Directors Recommends Its Stockholders Reject Agrium’s Exchange Offer

CF Industries sent the following letter to its stockholders:

March 23, 2009

CF INDUSTRIES’ BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU REJECT AGRIUM’S OFFER

Dear Fellow CF Industries Stockholder:

On March 16, 2009, Agrium Inc. commenced an exchange offer to acquire your shares at an exchange ratio of 1.0 common share of Agrium common stock plus $31.70 in cash, or 1.7866 Agrium common shares (subject to proration) or $72.00 in cash (subject to proration), per CF Industries common share.

Following a careful review of all aspects of the Agrium offer with management and its legal and financial advisors, your board concluded that Agrium’s offer is grossly inadequate, substantially undervalues CF Industries and is not in the best interests of CF Industries and its stockholders.

CF Industries’ board of directors believes that the continued pursuit of CF Industries’ long-term strategy, including its proposed strategic business combination with Terra Industries Inc., will create superior value for CF Industries stockholders and provide a significantly better growth platform than a combination with Agrium.

CF Industries’ board of directors considered numerous factors in making its recommendation, including the following:

  • Agrium’s offer is grossly inadequate and substantially undervalues CF Industries. The Board believes that Agrium’s offer does not fully reflect the intrinsic value of CF Industries, resulting in virtually no economic premium to CF Industries stockholders, and no premium for control of CF Industries. The inadequacy of the premium is particularly striking when measured against recent historical periods prior to the announcement of Agrium’s proposal on February 25, 2009. Based on daily closing prices of Agrium shares and CF Industries shares, the implied value of Agrium’s offer represented a premium of only 1.8% during the one-year period prior to February 25, 2009.
  • The timing of Agrium’s offer is opportunistic. The opportunistic timing of the offer, which includes a substantial cash component, takes advantage of the recent decline in share prices across the fertilizer sector and global equity markets, inflating the premium described by Agrium in their prospectus. Agrium’s CEO has acknowledged publicly that Agrium is attempting to buy CF Industries at a low valuation multiple, at a low point in the fertilizer cycle and at a low point in the stock markets.
  • The cash-and-stock nature of Agrium’s offer is disadvantageous to CF Industries stockholders. Approximately 44% of the total consideration is payable in cash. As a result, if the Agrium transaction were completed, CF Industries stockholders would be unable to participate in any recovery of the fertilizer sector or the global equity markets to the extent of the cash consideration. In addition, the substantial cash component prevents CF Industries stockholders from fully participating in the realization of any synergies resulting from the consummation of the transaction. Agrium has also elected to structure the offer and the second-step merger as a fully taxable transaction, which eliminates the ability of CF Industries stockholders, even stockholders that elect and receive 100% of the consideration payable in the offer or second-step merger in Agrium common shares, to determine when to recognize a gain or loss on their CF Industries shares.
  • The cash component of the Agrium offer represents no net increase in value to CF Industries stockholders. CF Industries’ own cash and debt capacity at December 31, 2008 generates more than $30 per CF Industries common share. The cash component of Agrium’s offer is being effectively funded by CF Industries and its stockholders receive virtually no additional cash value from the Agrium offer. As a result, CF Industries is itself funding the cash in Agrium’s offer and CF Industries stockholders are being asked to exchange a share of CF Industries, the best performing stock in the peer group, for a share of Agrium, one of the worst performing stocks in the peer group.
  • Agrium’s offer is fundamentally at odds with CF Industries’ long-term strategy, which has proven to be very successful. The offer is counter to CF Industries’ long-term strategy, which focuses on the higher-margin businesses of manufacturing and wholesale distribution of nitrogen and phosphate fertilizers. CF Industries’ board of directors believes that continuing to pursue this strategy as a standalone company will deliver more value to stockholders of CF Industries than the offer. In contrast, Agrium has pursued the opposite strategy, emphasizing and investing in a large retail, lower-margin business (representing approximately 55% of Agrium’s 2008 revenue) that competes directly with Agrium’s and CF Industries’ wholesale customers.
  • CF Industries’ record demonstrates the success of its business strategy; Agrium has underperformed. The board of directors believes that CF Industries’ successful operational track record and strategies for growth have been recognized by the market. At the same time, Agrium has significantly underperformed CF Industries and the global peer group. From CF Industries’ initial public offering through January 15, 2009, CF Industries shares increased 192%, outperforming the global peer group, which increased 87%. During this time, Agrium common shares increased only 34%.
  • Agrium’s offer is an attempt to interfere with CF Industries’ proposed strategic business combination with Terra Industries. The board of directors believes that a business combination with Terra will create superior value for CF Industries stockholders and a significantly better growth platform than a combination with Agrium. In fact, the board believes that the Agrium offer is a transparent attempt to derail CF Industries’ proposed business combination with Terra.
  • The combination of Agrium and CF Industries may expose CF Industries’ stockholders to significant risks and uncertainties.
  • The synergies assumed in Agrium’s offer are poorly delineated and uncertain.
  • The Board believes that CF Industries’ phosphate business is of substantially higher quality than Agrium’s phosphate business.
  • Several of Agrium’s expansion projects and investments in nitrogen manufacturing have underperformed and/or resulted in substantial write-downs.
  • The market has reacted negatively to Agrium’s offer.

CF INDUSTRIES’ BOARD WILL CONTINUE TO WORK IN YOUR BEST INTERESTS

CF Industries’ board of directors has made its recommendation to reject Agrium’s offer because the board of directors believes that the offer is grossly inadequate and substantially undervalues CF Industries, is fundamentally at odds with CF Industries’ long-term strategy which has been very successful, and exposes CF Industries and its stockholders to significant risks and uncertainties.

CF Industries’ board and management team will continue to act in the best interests of CF Industries and its stockholders. We encourage you to read the enclosed Schedule 14D-9, which provides further details with regard to the Board’s recommendation and discusses the factors that the Board carefully considered and evaluated in making its decision to reject Agrium’s offer.

If you have any questions concerning CF Industries’ Schedule 14D-9 or require additional copies of any materials filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, please contact our information agent, Innisfree M&A, toll-free at (877) 456-3507.

Thank you for your continued support and we appreciate your interest in CF Industries.

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Wilson
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

(Source: PRNewswire)

Topics:

Leave a Reply

Crop Inputs Stories

Crop InputsBayer Contests EPA’s Decision On Valuable Insecticide For Farmers
February 5, 2016
Crop Science, a division of Bayer, has announced it has refused a request by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to Read More
Wheat Field North Dakota
Seed/BiotechSyngenta Wins Seed Fraud Suit Against South Dakota Growers
February 5, 2016
Syngenta has obtained a $25,000 settlement from Paul and John Mayclin, Mayclin Farms, Plankinton, SD, in response to their Plant Read More
Crop InputsBayer To Contest EPA Flubendiamide Decision
February 5, 2016
Crop Science, a division of Bayer, announced today it has refused a request by EPA to voluntarily cancel the uses Read More
Syngenta
Seed/BiotechNot So Fast: ChemChina Syngenta Takeover Could Draw National Security Scrutiny
February 5, 2016
State-owned China National Chemical Corp. (ChemChina), which plans to buy Swiss seeds and pesticide maker Syngenta, will promptly start preparations Read More
Top 100 Articles
Elburn Cooperative
CropLife 100Elburn Cooperative Members Vote To Join CHS
December 28, 2015
With 81% of eligible producers voting, 94% cast an affirmative ballot for Elburn Cooperative, a diversified agricultural retailer based out Read More
West Central Cooperative, Jefferson, IA
CropLife 100Farmers Cooperative-West Central Merger Approved
December 21, 2015
The members of Farmers Cooperative Co. (FC), Ames, IA, and West Central Cooperative, Ralston, IA, have both approved the merger Read More
Wheat Growers Innovation Center, Bath, SD
CropLife 100Wheat Growers Opens Innovation Center
December 21, 2015
Wheat Growers’ commitment in providing its farmer-owners with the latest in technological advancements now has a one-of-a-kind focal point, as Read More
CropLife 100ARA Selects The Andersons As 2015 Retailer Of The Year
December 9, 2015
The Agricultural Retailers Association today named Maumee, OH-based The Andersons as its Retailer of the Year for 2015. The award Read More
CPS Washington Court House John Deere Sprayer
CropLife 100Application Equipment Report: It Is Easy Being Green For Top 100 Ag Retailers
December 5, 2015
On The Muppets television show, Kermit the Frog is famous for singing a song about the troubles he encounters in Read More
Fertilizer Bin
CropLife 100Fertilizer Sales: Another Down Year For Top 100 Ag Retailers
December 4, 2015
In pure number terms, the fertilizer category still dominates all crop inputs/services among CropLife 100 ag retailers. In 2015, for Read More
Latest News
Crop InputsBayer Contests EPA’s Decision On Valuable Insecticide F…
February 5, 2016
Crop Science, a division of Bayer, has announced it has refused a request by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to Read More
Wheat Field North Dakota
Seed/BiotechSyngenta Wins Seed Fraud Suit Against South Dakota Grow…
February 5, 2016
Syngenta has obtained a $25,000 settlement from Paul and John Mayclin, Mayclin Farms, Plankinton, SD, in response to their Plant Read More
ManagementOABA Annual Conference Wraps Up In Columbus
February 5, 2016
More than 300 Ohio AgriBusiness Association (OABA) members and industry professionals were on hand to engage in collaborative learning and Read More
Crop InputsBayer To Contest EPA Flubendiamide Decision
February 5, 2016
Crop Science, a division of Bayer, announced today it has refused a request by EPA to voluntarily cancel the uses Read More
Syngenta
Seed/BiotechNot So Fast: ChemChina Syngenta Takeover Could Draw Nat…
February 5, 2016
State-owned China National Chemical Corp. (ChemChina), which plans to buy Swiss seeds and pesticide maker Syngenta, will promptly start preparations Read More
Rendering of Syngenta Seedcare Institute expansion
Seed/BiotechExpansion Of Syngenta’s North America Seedcare In…
February 4, 2016
As demand for seed treatment knowledge and products grows among farmers, retailers and others in the seed industry, Syngenta is Read More
Soybean Field
Industry NewsArysta LifeScience Strengthens Sales Team
February 4, 2016
Arysta LifeScience North America recently announced three new personnel additions: Jake Cook and Peter White are Territory Sales Managers for Read More
Davor Pisk Syngenta COO
Crop InputsSyngenta COO: Why ChemChina Offer Beat Monsanto’s
February 4, 2016
Syngenta Chief Operating Officer Davor Pisk says he is confident the proposed acquisition by ChemChina will ultimately help preserve choice Read More
Young corn plants in soil
Crop InputsKoch Biological Solutions Invests In Pathway Biologic
February 4, 2016
An affiliate of Koch Biological Solutions, LLC has acquired a minority equity position in, and entered into collaboration with, Pathway Read More
Crop InputsABG: China Signs Off On Monsanto’s Roundup Ready …
February 3, 2016
Monsanto Co. on Wednesday announced it plans to launch its Roundup Ready 2 Xtend soybeans in time for the 2016 Read More
Syngenta headquarters in Basel, Switzerland
Crop Inputs6 Things To Know About The ChemChina-Syngenta Deal
February 3, 2016
After months of rumors and speculation, Syngenta has announced that ChemChina has offered to acquire the Swiss-based company. “In making Read More
FertilizerPhosphorus: Is Band Or Broadcast Application The Better…
February 3, 2016
Is band or broadcast application the better method when it comes to phosphorus? The answer to this question depends mostly Read More
Syngenta Sign
Crop InputsChemChina Nearing Deal To Buy Syngenta For Record $43 B…
February 3, 2016
China National Chemical Corp. is nearing an agreement to buy Swiss pesticide-and-seeds-maker Syngenta AG for about 43.7 billion francs ($42.8 Read More
Herbicides2015 ASA Trials Demonstrate Valent Fierce XLT Herbicide…
February 2, 2016
Valent U.S.A. today announced that new Fierce XLT Soybean Herbicide ranks in the top tier among growers for length of Read More
Crop Protection Products in storage
Paul SchrimpfCrop Input Selling: Return Of The Price List
February 2, 2016
It was a good 15 years ago, shortly after I first started writing for this esteemed publication, that it all Read More
Potash storage at Growmark
FertilizerThe Phosphate And Potash Outlook For 2016
February 2, 2016
Like other commodities, prices of the leading plant nutrient products dropped sharply in 2015. At this writing, the price of Read More
Chesapeake Bay
StewardshipKeeping A Watch On Water Issues
February 2, 2016
During a down cycle in the market, it’s difficult to think about investing for the long term. For retail businesses, Read More
Young Corn Plants
FertilizerNutrient Considerations For Low Corn Prices
February 2, 2016
Corn prices are low and many producers are asking tough questions about their nutrient management programs. Here are some suggestions Read More